Characterization of the standard and recommended CODIS markers.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2013-01

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

173
views
66
downloads

Citation Stats

Abstract

As U.S. courts grapple with constitutional challenges to DNA identification applications, judges are resting legal decisions on the fingerprint analogy, questioning whether the information from a DNA profile could, in light of scientific advances, reveal biomedically relevant information. While CODIS loci were selected largely because they lack phenotypic associations, how this criterion was assessed is unclear. To clarify their phenotypic relevance, we describe the standard and recommended CODIS markers within the context of what is known currently about the genome. We characterize the genomic regions and phenotypic associations of the 24 standard and suggested CODIS markers. None of the markers are within exons, although 12 are intragenic. No CODIS genotypes are associated with known phenotypes. This study provides clarification of the genomic significance of the key identification markers and supports--independent of the forensic scientific community--that the CODIS profiles provide identification but not sensitive or biomedically relevant information.

Department

Description

Provenance

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02253.x

Publication Info

Katsanis, Sara H, and Jennifer K Wagner (2013). Characterization of the standard and recommended CODIS markers. Journal of forensic sciences, 58 Suppl 1(SUPPL. 1). pp. S169–S172. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02253.x Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/17572.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.