Real-world Use of Mold-Active Triazole Prophylaxis in the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Diseases: Results From a Subgroup Analysis of a Multicenter National Registry.

dc.contributor.author

Nguyen, M Hong

dc.contributor.author

Ostrosky-Zeichner, Luis

dc.contributor.author

Pappas, Peter G

dc.contributor.author

Walsh, Thomas J

dc.contributor.author

Bubalo, Joseph

dc.contributor.author

Alexander, Barbara D

dc.contributor.author

Miceli, Marisa H

dc.contributor.author

Jiang, Jeanette

dc.contributor.author

Song, Yi

dc.contributor.author

Thompson, George R

dc.date.accessioned

2023-10-02T14:45:59Z

dc.date.available

2023-10-02T14:45:59Z

dc.date.issued

2023-09

dc.date.updated

2023-10-02T14:45:58Z

dc.description.abstract

Background

Antifungal prophylaxis can prevent invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) in high-risk, immunocompromised patients. This study assessed the real-world use of mold-active triazoles (MATs) for the prevention of IFDs.

Methods

This subgroup analysis of a multicenter, observational, prospective registry in the United States from March 2017 to April 2020 included patients who received MATs for prophylaxis (isavuconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole) at study index/enrollment. The primary objective was to describe patient characteristics and patterns of MAT use. Exploratory assessments included the frequency of breakthrough IFDs and MAT-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

Results

A total of 1177 patients (256 isavuconazole, 397 posaconazole, 272 voriconazole, and 252 multiple/sequenced MATs at/after index/enrollment) were included in the prophylaxis subgroup analysis. Patient characteristics were similar across MAT groups, but risk factors varied. Hematological malignancy predominated (76.5%) across all groups. Breakthrough IFDs occurred in 7.1% (73/1030) of patients with an investigator's assessment (5.0% [11/221] isavuconazole; 5.3% [20/374] posaconazole; 4.0% [9/226] voriconazole; and 15.8% [33/209] multiple/sequenced MATs). Aspergillus (29.5% [18/61]) and Candida (36.1% [22/61]) species were the most common breakthrough pathogens recovered. ADRs were reported in 14.1% of patients, and discontinuation of MATs due to ADRs was reported in 11.1% of patients (2.0% [5/245] isavuconazole; 8.2% [30/368] posaconazole; and 10.1% [27/267] voriconazole).

Conclusions

Breakthrough IFDs were uncommon in patients who received MATs for prophylaxis. Candida and Aspergillus species were the most commonly reported breakthrough pathogens. The discontinuation of MATs due to ADRs was infrequent. These findings support prophylactic strategies with isavuconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole in high-risk patients.
dc.identifier

ofad424

dc.identifier.issn

2328-8957

dc.identifier.issn

2328-8957

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/29079

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

dc.relation.ispartof

Open forum infectious diseases

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1093/ofid/ofad424

dc.subject

antifungal prophylaxis

dc.subject

isavuconazole

dc.subject

posaconazole

dc.subject

real-world

dc.subject

voriconazole

dc.title

Real-world Use of Mold-Active Triazole Prophylaxis in the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Diseases: Results From a Subgroup Analysis of a Multicenter National Registry.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Alexander, Barbara D|0000-0001-5868-0529

pubs.begin-page

ofad424

pubs.issue

9

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Pathology

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Infectious Diseases

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

10

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Real-world Use of Mold-Active Triazole Prophylaxis in the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Diseases Results From a Subgroup Ana.pdf
Size:
503.21 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format