Health Literacy and Success with Glaucoma Drop Administration.

dc.contributor.author

Kang, J Minjy

dc.contributor.author

Chatterjee, Ayan

dc.contributor.author

Rosdahl, Jullia A

dc.contributor.author

Bosworth, Hayden B

dc.contributor.author

Woolson, Sandra

dc.contributor.author

Olsen, Maren

dc.contributor.author

Sexton, Malina

dc.contributor.author

Kirshner, Miriam

dc.contributor.author

Muir, Kelly W

dc.date.accessioned

2024-01-02T20:09:09Z

dc.date.available

2024-01-02T20:09:09Z

dc.date.issued

2022-01

dc.description.abstract

Purpose

To assess the relationship between health literacy and successful glaucoma drop administration.

Design

Substudy of a single-site interventional randomized controlled trial.

Participants

Veterans receiving care at the Durham Veterans Affairs Eye Clinic who had a diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma were recruited if they endorsed poor drop adherence.

Methods

Participants underwent a health literacy evaluation using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) as well as a qualitative assessment of eye drop administration technique using 3 different criteria: (1) the drop was instilled in the eye, (2) only 1 drop was dispensed, and (3) the bottle was not potentially contaminated. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess the association of REALM score and successful drop administration, adjusting for age, disease severity, and Veterans Administration Care Assessment Needs (CAN) score.

Main outcome measures

Successful drop administration.

Results

Of the 179 participants with REALM scores and observed drop administration, 78% read at a high school level (HSL) or more and 22% read at less than HSL. Of the 179 participants, 87% (n = 156) successfully instilled the drop into the eye (criterion 1). A greater proportion of participants who read at HSL or more successfully instilled the drop in the eye compared with those reading at less than HSL (90.6% vs. 75.0%; P = 0.02). Rates of success with criterion 1 were similar across different levels of visual field severity. Care Assessment Needs scores were not statistically significant between those who did and those did not have successful overall drop technique.

Conclusions

Poor health literacy may be associated with decreased successful drop instillation in the eye in patients with glaucoma. Screening for and considering health literacy in developing interventions to improve glaucoma self-management may improve treatment adherence in a vulnerable population.
dc.identifier

S2589-4196(21)00136-8

dc.identifier.issn

2589-4234

dc.identifier.issn

2589-4196

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/29628

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

Ophthalmology. Glaucoma

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.ogla.2021.05.004

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Glaucoma

dc.subject

Glaucoma, Open-Angle

dc.subject

Antihypertensive Agents

dc.subject

Adult

dc.subject

Medication Adherence

dc.subject

Health Literacy

dc.title

Health Literacy and Success with Glaucoma Drop Administration.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Rosdahl, Jullia A|0000-0002-0103-2077

duke.contributor.orcid

Bosworth, Hayden B|0000-0001-6188-9825

duke.contributor.orcid

Olsen, Maren|0000-0002-9540-2103

duke.contributor.orcid

Muir, Kelly W|0000-0001-8213-7796

pubs.begin-page

26

pubs.end-page

31

pubs.issue

1

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Ophthalmology

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Ophthalmology, Glaucoma

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Population Health Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Innovation & Entrepreneurship

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Behavioral Medicine & Neurosciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke - Margolis Center For Health Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Division of Biostatistics

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

5

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S2589419621001368-main1.2.24_15.pdf
Size:
500.38 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format