Assessment of the quality of existing patient educational tools focused on sudden cardiac arrest: a systematic evaluation by the Sudden Cardiac Arrest Thought Leadership Alliance.

dc.contributor.author

Hazelton, Garrett

dc.contributor.author

Al-Khatib, Sana M

dc.contributor.author

Fonarow, Gregg C

dc.contributor.author

Thomas, Kevin L

dc.contributor.author

Hayes, David

dc.contributor.author

Sanders, Gillian D

dc.contributor.author

Campbell, Susan M

dc.contributor.author

Yancy, Clyde

dc.contributor.author

Peterson, Eric D

dc.contributor.author

Sears, Samuel

dc.coverage.spatial

New Zealand

dc.date.accessioned

2017-07-06T16:00:44Z

dc.date.available

2017-07-06T16:00:44Z

dc.date.issued

2013

dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND: Conveying contemporary treatment options for those at risk of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is challenging. The purpose of the present research was to evaluate the quality and usability of available patient educational tools relevant to SCA and its treatment options, such as implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). We hypothesized that this review would identify gaps in areas of information for the enhancement of patient education and decision-making materials. METHODS: We used a formal instrument to assess specific domains of content, development, and effectiveness of 18 available SCA and ICD educational tools. The multidisciplinary review panel included two electrophysiologists, two general cardiologists, a cardiac psychologist, a health services researcher, and a patient advocate. RESULTS: Of the 18 education tools, four were rated as "good, may need revisions, but sufficient for use", 12 were rated as "marginal, needs revision prior to use", and two were rated as "poor, inadequate for use". None of the tools were rated as being of "very good" or "excellent" quality. CONCLUSION: There appear to be opportunities to improve the quality and completeness of existing educational tools for patients with SCA and ICD. While many tools have been developed, they fall below current standards for supporting informed medical decision-making.

dc.identifier

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23641150

dc.identifier

ppa-7-361

dc.identifier.issn

1177-889X

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/15020

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Informa UK Limited

dc.relation.ispartof

Patient Prefer Adherence

dc.relation.isversionof

10.2147/PPA.S42637

dc.subject

decision-making

dc.subject

implantable cardioverter defibrillators

dc.subject

patient-centered outcomes research

dc.title

Assessment of the quality of existing patient educational tools focused on sudden cardiac arrest: a systematic evaluation by the Sudden Cardiac Arrest Thought Leadership Alliance.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Al-Khatib, Sana M|0000-0002-3561-0146

duke.contributor.orcid

Thomas, Kevin L|0000-0002-0040-5396

duke.contributor.orcid

Peterson, Eric D|0000-0002-5415-4721

pubs.author-url

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23641150

pubs.begin-page

361

pubs.end-page

368

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Cardiology

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.publication-status

Published online

pubs.volume

7

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Assessment of the quality of existing patient educational tools focused on sudden cardiac arrest: a systematic evaluation by the Sudden Cardiac Arrest Thought Leadership Alliance.pdf
Size:
223.79 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format