Reason, risk, and reward: Models for libraries and other stakeholders in an evolving scholarly publishing ecosystem

Loading...

Date

2014-01-01

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

494
views
385
downloads

Citation Stats

Attention Stats

Abstract

Scholarly publishing, and scholarly communication more generally, are based on patterns established over many decades and even centuries. Some of these patterns are clearly valuable and intimately related to core values of the academy, but others were based on the exigencies of the past, and new opportunities have brought into question whether it makes sense to persist in supporting old models. New technologies and new publishing models raise the question of how we should fund and operate scholarly publishing and scholarly communication in the future, moving away from a scarcity model based on the exchange of physical goods that restricts access to scholarly literature unless a market-based exchange takes place. This essay describes emerging models that attempt to shift scholarly communication to a more open-access and mission-based approach and that try to retain control of scholarship by academics and the institutions and scholarly societies that support them. It explores changing practices for funding scholarly journals and changing services provided by academic libraries, changes instituted with the end goal of providing more access to more readers, stimulating new scholarship, and removing inefficiencies from a system ready for change. © 2014 by the American Anthropological Association.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.14506/ca29.2.03

Publication Info

Mangiafico, Paolo, and Kevin L Smith (2014). Reason, risk, and reward: Models for libraries and other stakeholders in an evolving scholarly publishing ecosystem. Cultural Anthropology, 29(2). pp. 216–235. 10.14506/ca29.2.03 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/8875.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.