Age and Baseline Disability Inform Tradeoffs in Cost Utility of Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgery can be an effective intervention for adult spinal deformity (ASD), but it is expensive and associated with a high complication rate. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of ASD surgery, with age and baseline (BL) disability as key variables. METHODS: Decision-analytic models were constructed to assess 3 treatment strategies: operative, nonoperative, and nonoperative with delayed surgery. Model inputs were derived from prospective registry data and published literature, and modeled stochastically. Equivalent decision trees but with different parameter values were constructed for 6 patient subgroups categorized by age ("middle-aged" group: mean age 50 years vs "elderly" group: mean age 70 years), and disability level (low: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) <20, moderate ODI 20-40, high ODI >40). 1000 Monte Carlo simulations of a hypothetical population of 10 000 patients were generated and used to determine cost-effectiveness metrics and their uncertainty. RESULTS: ASD surgery was cost-effective at a $150 000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) willingness-to-pay threshold for middle-aged groups with moderate disability (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) = $91 340/QALY) favored in 60.1% of patients, and high disability (ICER = $66 090/QALY) favored in 69.9% of patients. For elderly patients with high disability (ICER = $154 300/QALY), surgery was favored in 49.7% of patients. For all other groups, the ICER was above $194 000 and surgery was favored in less than 46.3% of patients. Middle-aged patients gained higher incremental QALYs across all disability levels, and operative strategy demonstrated higher cost-utility in middle-aged patients at the same BL disability. One-way deterministic sensitivity analysis revealed probability of failed nonoperative treatment favored surgery, especially in patients with low disability, whereas probability of complicated operative course favored nonoperative treatment, especially in elderly patients. CONCLUSION: Our analysis revealed that middle-aged patients and those with higher BL disability are more likely to achieve cost-effective surgical intervention. These findings set a basis for further investigation that could better inform clinical decision making for elderly patients experiencing ASD.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Adult spinal deformity, Cost-effectiveness, Cost-utility analysis, Stochastic modeling

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1227/neu.0000000000003550

Publication Info

Azad, Tej D, Alessio Pignatelli, Noor Alesawy, Jeffrey L Gum, Peter Passias, Christopher I Shaffrey, Justin Smith, Shay Bess, et al. (2025). Age and Baseline Disability Inform Tradeoffs in Cost Utility of Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. Neurosurgery. 10.1227/neu.0000000000003550 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/32488.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Passias

Peter Passias

Instructor in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

Throughout my medical career, I have remained dedicated to improving my patients' quality of life. As a specialist in adult cervical and spinal deformity surgery, I understand the significant impact our interventions have on individuals suffering from debilitating pain and physical and mental health challenges. Spinal deformity surgery merges the complexities of spinal biomechanics with the needs of an aging population. My research focuses on spinal alignment, biomechanics, innovative surgical techniques, and health economics to ensure value-based care that enhances patient outcomes.

Shaffrey

Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey

Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery

I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex spinal disorders. My patient evaluation and management philosophy is to provide engaged, compassionate care that focuses on providing the simplest and least aggressive treatment option for a particular condition. In many cases, non-operative treatment options exist to improve a patient’s symptoms. I have been actively engaged in clinical research to find the best ways to manage spinal disorders in order to achieve better results with fewer complications.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.