Functional evolution of mammalian odorant receptors.

dc.contributor.advisor

Matsunami, Hiroaki

dc.contributor.advisor

Caron, Marc G

dc.contributor.advisor

Tracey, William Daniel

dc.contributor.advisor

Drea, Christine M

dc.contributor.advisor

Wray, Gregory A

dc.contributor.author

Adipietro, Kaylin Alexis

dc.date.accessioned

2012-09-04T13:15:49Z

dc.date.issued

2012

dc.department

Genetics and Genomics

dc.description.abstract

The ability to detect small volatile molecules in the environment is mediated by the large repertoire of odorant receptors (ORs) in each species. The mammalian OR repertoire is an attractive model to study evolution because ORs have been subjected to rapid gene gains and losses between species, presumably caused by changes of the olfactory system to adapt to the environment. Despite the complicated history, clear orthologs—genes related via speciation—can still be identified even in distantly related species. Functional assessment of ORs in related species remains largely untested and sequence similarity is often used as a proxy for functional data. Here I describe the functional properties of primate and rodent ORs to determine how well evolutionary distance predicts functional characteristics. Using human and mouse ORs with previously identified ligands, we cloned 18 OR orthologs from chimpanzee and rhesus macaque and 17 mouse-rat orthologous pairs that are broadly representative of the OR repertoire. Using a heterologous expression system, we functionally characterized the responses of ORs to a wide panel of odors and found similar ligand selectivity but dramatic differences in response magnitude. 87% of human-primate orthologs and 94% of mouse-rat orthologs showed differences in receptor potency (EC50) and/or efficacy (dynamic range) to an individual ligand. Notably dN/dS ratio, an indication of selective pressure during evolution, does not predict functional similarities between orthologs. Additionally, we found that orthologs responded to a common ligand 82% of the time, while human OR paralogs of the same subfamily responded to the common ligand only 33% of the time. Our results suggest that while OR orthologs tend to show conserved ligand selectivity, their potency and/or efficacy dynamically change during evolution, even in closely related species. These functional changes in orthologs provide a platform for examining how the evolution of ORs can meet species-specific demands.

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/5830

dc.language

eng

dc.language.iso

en_US

dc.subject

Animals

dc.subject

Evolution, Molecular

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Ligands

dc.subject

Macaca mulatta

dc.subject

Mice

dc.subject

Pan troglodytes

dc.subject

Phylogeny

dc.subject

Rats

dc.subject

Receptors, Odorant

dc.subject

Selection, Genetic

dc.subject

Sensitivity and Specificity

dc.subject

Sequence Homology, Amino Acid

dc.subject

Species Specificity

dc.title

Functional evolution of mammalian odorant receptors.

dc.type

Dissertation

pubs.author-url

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22807691

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Institute for Brain Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Molecular Genetics and Microbiology

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Neurobiology

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.publication-status

Published

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Adipietro_duke_0066D_11571.pdf
Size:
45.53 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections