NRG Oncology Survey on Practice and Technology Use in SRT and SBRT Delivery.

dc.contributor.author

Chetvertkov, Mikhail

dc.contributor.author

Monroe, James Ira

dc.contributor.author

Boparai, Jaskaran

dc.contributor.author

Solberg, Timothy D

dc.contributor.author

Pafundi, Deanna H

dc.contributor.author

Ruo, Russell L

dc.contributor.author

Gladstone, David J

dc.contributor.author

Yin, Fang-Fang

dc.contributor.author

Chetty, Indrin J

dc.contributor.author

Benedict, Stanley

dc.contributor.author

Followill, David S

dc.contributor.author

Xiao, Ying

dc.contributor.author

Sohn, Jason W

dc.date.accessioned

2021-04-01T13:23:54Z

dc.date.available

2021-04-01T13:23:54Z

dc.date.issued

2020-01

dc.date.updated

2021-04-01T13:23:53Z

dc.description.abstract

Purpose

To assess stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT)/stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) practices by polling clinics participating in multi-institutional clinical trials.

Methods

The NRG Oncology Medical Physics Subcommittee distributed a survey consisting of 23 questions, which covered general technologies, policies, and procedures used in the Radiation Oncology field for the delivery of SRT/SBRT (9 questions), and site-specific questions for brain SRT, lung SBRT, and prostate SBRT (14 questions). Surveys were distributed to 1,996 radiotherapy institutions included on the membership rosters of the five National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) groups. Patient setup, motion management, target localization, prescriptions, and treatment delivery technique data were reported back by 568 institutions (28%).

Results

97.5% of respondents treat lung SBRT patients, 77.0% perform brain SRT, and 29.1% deliver prostate SBRT. 48.8% of clinics require a physicist present for every fraction of SBRT, 18.5% require a physicist present for the initial SBRT fraction only, and 14.9% require a physicist present for the entire first fraction, including set-up approval for all subsequent fractions. 55.3% require physician approval for all fractions, and 86.7% do not reposition without x-ray imaging. For brain SRT, most institutions (83.9%) use a planning target volume (PTV) margin of 2 mm or less. Lung SBRT PTV margins of 3 mm or more are used in 80.6% of clinics. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is the dominant delivery method in 62.8% of SRT treatments, 70.9% of lung SBRT, and 68.3% of prostate SBRT.

Conclusion

This report characterizes SRT/SBRT practices in radiotherapy clinics participating in clinical trials. Data made available here allows the radiotherapy community to compare their practice with that of other clinics, determine what is achievable, and assess areas for improvement.
dc.identifier.issn

2234-943X

dc.identifier.issn

2234-943X

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/22469

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Frontiers Media SA

dc.relation.ispartof

Frontiers in oncology

dc.relation.isversionof

10.3389/fonc.2020.602607

dc.subject

best practices

dc.subject

clinical trials

dc.subject

radiotherapy

dc.subject

stereotactic body radiotherapy

dc.subject

stereotactic radiotherapy

dc.title

NRG Oncology Survey on Practice and Technology Use in SRT and SBRT Delivery.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Yin, Fang-Fang|0000-0002-2025-4740|0000-0003-1064-2149

pubs.begin-page

602607

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Kunshan University Faculty

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Radiation Oncology

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Kunshan University

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

10

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
NRG Oncology Survey on Practice and Technology Use in SRT and SBRT Delivery.pdf
Size:
421.59 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version