Continuation versus discontinuation of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19: a prospective, randomised, open-label trial.
Date
2021-01-07
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Repository Usage Stats
views
downloads
Citation Stats
Abstract
Background
Biological considerations suggest that renin-angiotensin system inhibitors might influence the severity of COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate whether continuing versus discontinuing renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers) affects outcomes in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19.Methods
The REPLACE COVID trial was a prospective, randomised, open-label trial done at 20 large referral hospitals in seven countries worldwide. Eligible participants were aged 18 years and older who were admitted to hospital with COVID-19 and were receiving a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor before admission. Individuals with contraindications to continuation or discontinuation of renin-angiotensin system inhibitor therapy were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to continuation or discontinuation of their renin-angiotensin system inhibitor using permuted block randomisation, with allocation concealed using a secure web-based randomisation system. The primary outcome was a global rank score in which participants were ranked across four hierarchical tiers incorporating time to death, duration of mechanical ventilation, time on renal replacement or vasopressor therapy, and multiorgan dysfunction during the hospitalisation. Primary analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. The REPLACE COVID trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04338009.Findings
Between March 31 and Aug 20, 2020, 152 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to either continue or discontinue renin-angiotensin system inhibitor therapy (continuation group n=75; discontinuation group n=77). Mean age of participants was 62 years (SD 12), 68 (45%) were female, mean body-mass index was 33 kg/m2 (SD 8), and 79 (52%) had diabetes. Compared with discontinuation of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, continuation had no effect on the global rank score (median rank 73 [IQR 40-110] for continuation vs 81 [38-117] for discontinuation; β-coefficient 8 [95% CI -13 to 29]). There were 16 (21%) of 75 participants in the continuation arm versus 14 (18%) of 77 in the discontinuation arm who required intensive care unit admission or invasive mechanical ventilation, and 11 (15%) of 75 participants in the continuation group versus ten (13%) of 77 in the discontinuation group died. 29 (39%) participants in the continuation group and 28 (36%) participants in the discontinuation group had at least one adverse event (χ2 test of adverse events between treatment groups p=0·77). There was no difference in blood pressure, serum potassium, or creatinine during follow-up across the two groups.Interpretation
Consistent with international society recommendations, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors can be safely continued in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19.Funding
REPLACE COVID Investigators, REPLACE COVID Trial Social Fundraising Campaign, and FastGrants.Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Subjects
Citation
Permalink
Published Version (Please cite this version)
Publication Info
Cohen, Jordana B, Thomas C Hanff, Preethi William, Nancy Sweitzer, Nelson R Rosado-Santander, Carola Medina, Juan E Rodriguez-Mori, Nicolás Renna, et al. (2021). Continuation versus discontinuation of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19: a prospective, randomised, open-label trial. The Lancet. Respiratory medicine. 10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30558-0 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/22323.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
Scholars@Duke

N. Alejandro (Alex) Barbagelata
Medical degree at the University of Buenos Aires. Residency/Cardiology Fellowship at the Sanatorio Guemes/Favaloro Foundation. Cardiac cath fellow at the Sanatorio Guemes. International Scholar in Artificial Organs at the Cleveland Clinic. Duke Clinical Research Institute research fellow.
Faculty member in the Cardiology Division at the University of Texas Medical Branch with the rank of Assoc Professor of Medicine as CCU and Cardiac Cath Lab attending (invasive cardiologist) on all type of cardiovascular diseases Director or Associated Dir of the Advanced Heart Failure that included devices such as aquapheresis, 2.5 impella, Cardiac Power, and surgical such as being part of the approval team for destination therapy on Heart Mate II. UNOS primary physician in the Heart Transplant program 2011-2013. Current Adj Ast Professor Medicine/Cardiology at Duke University, member of the Board of Directors of DUCCS (a Duke Clinical Research organization). Director of the Advanced Heart Failure Postgraduate Program at the Universidad Catolica Argentina (UCA). Staff member Interventional Cardiology service at the Instituto del diagnostico y tratamiento, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Research Interest in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure, percutaneous and surgical devices in heart failure. Early identification of STEMI such as criteria's for MI in LBBB (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sgarbossa's_criteria), new descriptors in Q wave/non Q wave, use of telemedicine for timeliness reperfusion. Co-editor of the book on “prehospital Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction” Member of the Int. Speaker Bureau AHA. Published more than 60 peer articles and more than 100 hundred abstract and speaker in a number of Scientific Meetings.

Daniel Len Edmonston
My primary research focus lies at the intersection of kidney and cardiovascular disease including pulmonary hypertension, heart failure, and atherosclerotic disease in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.