Does surgical approach affect headache relief in patients undergoing cervical fusion for subaxial cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data.
Date
2026-05
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Repository Usage Stats
views
downloads
Citation Stats
Attention Stats
Abstract
Headache is a common complaint associated with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), presenting in more than one-third of patients. Surgical treatment of CSM has been linked to improved headache symptoms. The etiology of headache associated with subaxial cervical spine disorders is not well understood, nor is the mechanism of surgery in relieving symptom intensity. The authors hypothesized that surgical treatment of CSM has a positive impact on patients with headache symptoms, and that anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) provides simpler access to foraminal decompression without disruption of posterior myofascial planes and thus could better relieve cervicogenic headache symptoms than a posterior approach. The present study seeks to compare the effect of posterior versus anterior approaches on headache symptom relief in patients with CSM. The authors conducted a post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from the 14-site Spine CORe™ study group using their data from the cervical module of the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD). Patients who underwent cervical surgery via ACDF or posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion (PCLF) to treat CSM were included and reviewed. The primary outcome of Neck Disability Index (NDI) headache scores (Likert scale 0-5) were collected at baseline and at 3, 12, 24, and 60 months postoperatively. Patients with a minimum preoperative headache score of 1 at baseline were included in the analysis. Of a total of 1085 patients in the QOD database, 697 with CSM and 5-year follow-up data endorsed headache preoperatively, with a median NDI headache score of 2 and a mean NDI headache score of 2.4 at baseline. The mean patient age was 58.6 (SD 11.5) years, 490 (70.3%) had concurrent neck pain and 251 (36.0%) had concurrent C2 (n = 3, 0.4%), C3 (n = 107, 15.4%), or C4 (n = 141, 20.2%) radiculopathy. Four hundred nineteen patients (60.1%) underwent ACDF, 119 (17.1%) underwent PCLF, with the remaining 159 (22.8%) undergoing anterior decompressions without fusion, laminoplasties, laminectomies, foraminotomies, or a combination of nonfusion decompression procedures. Postoperative headache intensities were lower than baseline intensities (Kruskal-Wallis test = 373, p < 0.0001) by a median of 1 point. By the end of the 5-year follow up, 365 (87.1%) of the ACDF patients and 99 (83.2%) of the PCLF patients experienced at least some headache relief (χ2 = 0.49, p = 0.48), defined by ≥ 1-point ordinal scale improvement of the headache score. Furthermore, 201 (48%) ACDF and 42 (35.3%) PCLF patients experienced full headache relief (χ2 = 6.01, p = 0.01), defined as a decrease to a score of zero postoperatively. There was no effect of age (β = 0.5221, p = 0.32), concurrent neck pain (U = 46476, p = 0.56), or C2-4 radiculopathy (U = 24682, p = 0.98) on headache relief by the end of follow-up. Surgical treatment of CSM improved symptom intensity in patients experiencing preoperative headache. ACDF and PCLF were equally effective in relieving headache at 3-60 months postoperatively. Postoperative headache relief was not affected by surgical approach, age, concurrent neck pain, or concurrent C2-4 radiculopathy.
Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Subjects
Citation
Permalink
Published Version (Please cite this version)
Publication Info
Bhowmick, Deb A, Benjamin Succop, Erica F Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, Anthony L Asher, Paul K Kim, Eric A Potts, Kevin T Foley, et al. (2026). Does surgical approach affect headache relief in patients undergoing cervical fusion for subaxial cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data. Neurosurgical focus, 60(5). p. E4. 10.3171/2025.12.focus25934 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/34637.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
Scholars@Duke
Deb Ashish Bhowmick
I specialize in complex spinal and trauma surgery with a focus on pathology of the craniocervical junction, congenital spinal anomalies in adults, and cervical spinal deformities. I offer the highest quality of surgical care to improve or prevent the worsening of physical function. Whenever possible, I work with my patients to explore the non-surgical management of spinal conditions.
Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey
I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex spinal disorders. My patient evaluation and management philosophy is to provide engaged, compassionate care that focuses on providing the simplest and least aggressive treatment option for a particular condition. In many cases, non-operative treatment options exist to improve a patient’s symptoms. I have been actively engaged in clinical research to find the best ways to manage spinal disorders in order to achieve better results with fewer complications.
Oren N Gottfried
I specialize in the surgical management of all complex cervical, thoracic, lumbar, or sacral spinal diseases by using minimally invasive as well as standard approaches for arthritis or degenerative disease, deformity, tumors, and trauma. I have a special interest in the treatment of thoracolumbar deformities, occipital-cervical problems, and in helping patients with complex spinal issues from previously unsuccessful surgery or recurrent disease.I listen to my patients to understand their symptoms and experiences so I can provide them with the information and education they need to manage their disease. I make sure my patients understand their treatment options, and what will work best for their individual condition. I treat all my patients with care and concern – just as I would treat my family. I am available to address my patients' concerns before and after surgery. I aim to improve surgical outcomes for my patients and care of all spine patients with active research evaluating clinical and radiological results after spine surgery with multiple prospective databases. I am particularly interested in prevention of spinal deformity, infections, complications, and recurrent spinal disease. Also, I study whether patient specific variables including pelvic/sacral anatomy and sagittal spinal balance predict complications from spine surgery.
Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.
