Proceeding of SPIE Medical Imaging

dc.contributor.author

Ria, Francesco

dc.contributor.author

Samei, Ehsan

dc.contributor.author

Wilson, JM

dc.contributor.author

Zhang, Y

dc.date.accessioned

2017-03-17T22:12:45Z

dc.date.available

2017-03-17T22:12:45Z

dc.date.issued

2017-03-17

dc.description.abstract

The balance between risk and benefit in modern CT scanners is governed by the automatic adaptation mechanisms that adjust x-ray flux for accommodating patient size to achieve certain image noise values. The effectiveness of this adaptation is an important aspect of CT performance and should ideally be characterized in the context of real patient cases. Objective of this study was to characterize CT performance with an index that includes image-noise and radiation dose across a clinical patient population. The study included 1526 examinations performed by three scanners, from two vendors, used for two clinical protocols (abdominopelvic and chest). The dose-patient size and noise-patient size dependencies were linearized, and a 3D-fit was performed for each protocol and each scanner with a planar function. In the fit residual plots the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values were estimated as a metric of CT adaptability across the patient population. The RMSE values were between 0.0344 HU1/2 and 0.0215 HU1/2: different scanners offer varying degrees of reproducibility of noise and dose across the population. This analysis could be performed with phantoms, but phantom data would only provide information concerning specific exposure parameters for a scan: instead, a general population comparison is a way to obtain new information related to the relevant clinical adaptability of scanner models. A theoretical relationship between image noise, CTDIvol and patient size was determined based on real patient data. This relationship may provide a new index related to the scanners' adaptability concerning image quality and radiation dose across a patient population. © (2017) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13860

dc.relation.isreplacedby

10161/13861

dc.relation.isreplacedby

http://hdl.handle.net/10161/13861

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1117/12.2255631

dc.title

Proceeding of SPIE Medical Imaging

dc.type

Conference

pubs.author-url

http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2255631

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Radiology

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.publisher-url

http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2255631

Files