Using non-invasive brain stimulation to promote auditory neuroplasticity in the setting of hearing intervention: A scoping review.

dc.contributor.author

Wright, Joshua M

dc.contributor.author

Appelbaum, Lawrence Gregory

dc.contributor.author

Smith, Sherri L

dc.contributor.author

Overath, Tobias

dc.contributor.author

Kaplan, Samantha

dc.contributor.author

Cooper, Matthew

dc.contributor.author

Ronen, Ofri

dc.contributor.author

Tobi, Tamar

dc.contributor.author

Peterchev, Angel V

dc.contributor.author

Francis, Howard W

dc.date.accessioned

2026-04-01T14:43:18Z

dc.date.available

2026-04-01T14:43:18Z

dc.date.issued

2026-02

dc.description.abstract

Cochlear implants (CI) have revolutionized our ability to treat severe sensorineural hearing loss (HL), yet there is substantial variability in speech perception outcomes. This may be due, in part, to the central nervous system's (CNS) response to HL, which is variable in extent and reversibility. Compensatory responses to HL mediated by neuroplasticity within the auditory CNS and other functional regions may interfere with perceptual, integrative and/or cognitive processes required to develop new listening skills with a CI. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) approaches offer a means to modulate the excitability of the brain and associated Hebbian processes that promote neuroplasticity. NIBS may therefore provide a means to increase gains in listening and communication function for individuals undergoing hearing rehabilitation. A narrative review is first performed to synthesize current evidence on CNS neuroplasticity associated with HL and intervention, and explores the conceptual rationale for applying NIBS to enhancing rehabilitation outcomes using contemporary hearing technology and auditory training. A formal scoping review was then done to identify studies that look at the use of NIBS in hearing rehabilitation in those with HL. Currently, clinical data for NIBS in patients with HL remain scarce. At present, conclusions regarding NIBS efficacy for improving hearing outcomes are premature; however, emerging findings provide a promising direction for future translational research. Limitations include the lack of standardized stimulation protocols and insufficient longitudinal data. Addressing these gaps will be essential to determine whether NIBS can safely and effectively enhance relevant neuroplasticity that improves rehabilitation outcomes for individuals with HL.

dc.identifier

S0378-5955(26)00052-3

dc.identifier.issn

0378-5955

dc.identifier.issn

1878-5891

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/34339

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

Hearing research

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.heares.2026.109576

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

Auditory neuroplasticity

dc.subject

Auditory rehabilitation

dc.subject

Cochlear implants

dc.subject

Non-invasive brain stimulation

dc.title

Using non-invasive brain stimulation to promote auditory neuroplasticity in the setting of hearing intervention: A scoping review.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Overath, Tobias|0000-0003-4150-2704

duke.contributor.orcid

Peterchev, Angel V|0000-0002-4385-065X

duke.contributor.orcid

Francis, Howard W|0000-0003-2231-429X

pubs.begin-page

109576

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Trinity College of Arts & Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Psychology & Neuroscience

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Institute for Brain Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Center for Cognitive Neuroscience

pubs.organisational-group

Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Otology, Neurotology & Skull Base Surgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

474

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Wright_etal(2026)HearingResearch.pdf
Size:
2.81 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format