Why a Planetary Boundary, If It Is Not Planetary, and the Boundary Is Undefined? A Reply to Rockström et al.

dc.contributor.author

Montoya, José M

dc.contributor.author

Donohue, Ian

dc.contributor.author

Pimm, Stuart L

dc.date.accessioned

2021-08-02T18:00:21Z

dc.date.available

2021-08-02T18:00:21Z

dc.date.issued

2018-04

dc.date.updated

2021-08-02T18:00:20Z

dc.identifier

S0169-5347(18)30012-0

dc.identifier.issn

0169-5347

dc.identifier.issn

1872-8383

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23533

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

Trends in ecology & evolution

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.tree.2018.01.008

dc.subject

Biodiversity

dc.subject

Environmental Pollution

dc.title

Why a Planetary Boundary, If It Is Not Planetary, and the Boundary Is Undefined? A Reply to Rockström et al.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Pimm, Stuart L|0000-0003-4206-2456

pubs.begin-page

234

pubs.issue

4

pubs.organisational-group

Nicholas School of the Environment

pubs.organisational-group

Environmental Sciences and Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

33

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
327 Montoya reply.pdf
Size:
58.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format