Effects of task instruction on autobiographical memory specificity in young and older adults.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2014

Authors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

240
views
246
downloads

Citation Stats

Abstract

Older adults tend to retrieve autobiographical information that is overly general (i.e., not restricted to a single event, termed the overgenerality effect) relative to young adults' specific memories. A vast majority of studies that have reported overgenerality effects explicitly instruct participants to retrieve specific memories, thereby requiring participants to maintain task goals, inhibit inappropriate responses, and control their memory search. Since these processes are impaired in healthy ageing, it is important to determine whether such task instructions influence the magnitude of the overgenerality effect in older adults. In the current study participants retrieved autobiographical memories during presentation of musical clips. Task instructions were manipulated to separate age-related differences in the specificity of underlying memory representations from age-related differences in following task instructions. Whereas young adults modulated memory specificity based on task demands, older adults did not. These findings suggest that reported rates of overgenerality in older adults' memories might include age-related differences in memory representation, as well as differences in task compliance. Such findings provide a better understanding of the underlying cognitive mechanisms involved in age-related changes in autobiographical memory and may also be valuable for future research examining effects of overgeneral memory on general well-being.

Department

Description

Provenance

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1080/09658211.2013.820325

Publication Info

Ford, JH, David C Rubin and Kelly S Giovanello (2014). Effects of task instruction on autobiographical memory specificity in young and older adults. Memory, 22(6). pp. 722–736. 10.1080/09658211.2013.820325 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/9763.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.