Factors influencing malaria control policy-making in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania.

dc.contributor.author

Mutero, CM

dc.contributor.author

Kramer, RA

dc.contributor.author

Paul, C.

dc.contributor.author

Lesser, A

dc.contributor.author

Miranda, ML

dc.contributor.author

Mboera, LEG

dc.contributor.author

Kiptui, R

dc.contributor.author

Kabatereine, N

dc.contributor.author

Ameneshewa, B

dc.coverage.spatial

England

dc.date.accessioned

2015-02-12T19:20:13Z

dc.date.issued

2014-08-08

dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND: Policy decisions for malaria control are often difficult to make as decision-makers have to carefully consider an array of options and respond to the needs of a large number of stakeholders. This study assessed the factors and specific objectives that influence malaria control policy decisions, as a crucial first step towards developing an inclusive malaria decision analysis support tool (MDAST). METHODS: Country-specific stakeholder engagement activities using structured questionnaires were carried out in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania. The survey respondents were drawn from a non-random purposeful sample of stakeholders, targeting individuals in ministries and non-governmental organizations whose policy decisions and actions are likely to have an impact on the status of malaria. Summary statistics across the three countries are presented in aggregate. RESULTS: Important findings aggregated across countries included a belief that donor preferences and agendas were exerting too much influence on malaria policies in the countries. Respondents on average also thought that some relevant objectives such as engaging members of parliament by the agency responsible for malaria control in a particular country were not being given enough consideration in malaria decision-making. Factors found to influence decisions regarding specific malaria control strategies included donor agendas, costs, effectiveness of interventions, health and environmental impacts, compliance and/acceptance, financial sustainability, and vector resistance to insecticides. CONCLUSION: Malaria control decision-makers in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania take into account health and environmental impacts as well as cost implications of different intervention strategies. Further engagement of government legislators and other policy makers is needed in order to increase funding from domestic sources, reduce donor dependence, sustain interventions and consolidate current gains in malaria.

dc.identifier

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25107509

dc.identifier

1475-2875-13-305

dc.identifier.eissn

1475-2875

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/9480

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

dc.relation.ispartof

Malar J

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1186/1475-2875-13-305

dc.subject

Africa, Eastern

dc.subject

Antimalarials

dc.subject

Decision Support Techniques

dc.subject

Health Policy

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Malaria

dc.subject

Policy Making

dc.title

Factors influencing malaria control policy-making in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Kramer, RA|0000-0002-1325-7425

pubs.author-url

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25107509

pubs.begin-page

305

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Economics

pubs.organisational-group

Environmental Sciences and Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Global Health Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Nicholas School of the Environment

pubs.organisational-group

Staff

pubs.organisational-group

Trinity College of Arts & Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.publication-status

Published online

pubs.volume

13

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Factors influencing malaria control policy-making in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania..pdf
Size:
5.63 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version