Item Response Theory Analysis of the MDS-UPDRS Motor Examination: Tremor vs. Nontremor Items.

dc.contributor.author

Tosin, Michelle Hyczy de Siqueira

dc.contributor.author

Goetz, Christopher G

dc.contributor.author

Luo, Sheng

dc.contributor.author

Choi, Dongrak

dc.contributor.author

Stebbins, Glenn T

dc.date.accessioned

2020-07-01T13:53:12Z

dc.date.available

2020-07-01T13:53:12Z

dc.date.issued

2020-05-29

dc.date.updated

2020-07-01T13:53:08Z

dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND:In PD, tremor severity behaves differently from other core motor features. However, the most commonly used assessment of overall motor severity, total MDS-UPDRS Motor Examination (Part 3) score, does not account for this distinction. OBJECTIVES:To investigate the Motor Examination (Part 3) using Item Response Theory approaches focusing on sample-independent strategies that assess how well items measure latent models of PD motor severity. METHODS:Data from 6,298 PD patients were analyzed with graded response model Item Response Theory approaches involving two analyses all 33 Part 3 items versus the 10 tremor items and 23 bradykinesia, rigidity, gait, and posture items considered separately. The strength of relationship between items and the latent measure of parkinsonian motor severity (discrimination parameter) and calculated thresholds (location parameters) were assessed using the mirt program implemented in R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). RESULTS:Analyzing all Part 3 items together, nontremor items demonstrated good discrimination parameters (mean = 1.83 ± 0.37) and range of thresholds (-1.73 to +4.42), but tremor items had poor discrimination (mean = 0.52 ± 0.76) and thresholds (-0.69 to 14.29). Segregating nontremor from tremor items in two independent analyses provided markedly improved discrimination and location parameters for both. CONCLUSIONS:MDS-UPDRS Part 3 tremor and nontremor items have very different relations to the construct of PD severity. Strongly improved clinimetric properties for Part 3 are obtained when tremor and nontremor items are considered separately. We suggest that evaluating PD motor severity, as an operationalized summary measure, is best attained through separate analyses with tremor and nontremor motor scores. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

dc.identifier.issn

0885-3185

dc.identifier.issn

1531-8257

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21104

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Wiley

dc.relation.ispartof

Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1002/mds.28110

dc.subject

MDS-UPDRS

dc.subject

Parkinson's disease

dc.subject

clinimetrics

dc.subject

item response theory

dc.title

Item Response Theory Analysis of the MDS-UPDRS Motor Examination: Tremor vs. Nontremor Items.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Luo, Sheng|0000-0003-4214-5809

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.publication-status

Published

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2020Tosin_Goetz_Luo_Choi_Stebbins2020MDS_tremor_nontremor.pdf
Size:
440.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2020Tosin_Goetz_Luo_Choi_Stebbins2020MDS_tremor_nontremor_suppl.docx
Size:
4.09 MB
Format:
Unknown data format
Description:
Supporting information