Population segmentation based on healthcare needs: a systematic review.

dc.contributor.author

Chong, Jia Loon

dc.contributor.author

Lim, Ka Keat

dc.contributor.author

Matchar, David Bruce

dc.date.accessioned

2021-05-05T06:24:52Z

dc.date.available

2021-05-05T06:24:52Z

dc.date.issued

2019-08-13

dc.date.updated

2021-05-05T06:24:51Z

dc.description.abstract

Background

Healthcare needs-based population segmentation is a promising approach for enabling the development and evaluation of integrated healthcare service models that meet healthcare needs. However, healthcare policymakers interested in understanding adult population healthcare needs may not be aware of suitable population segmentation tools available for use in the literature and barring better-known alternatives, may reinvent the wheel by creating and validating their own tools rather than adapting available tools in the literature. Therefore, we undertook a systematic review to identify all available tools which operationalize healthcare need-based population segmentation, to help inform policymakers developing population-level health service programmes.

Methods

Using search terms reflecting concepts of population, healthcare need and segmentation, we systematically reviewed and included articles containing healthcare need-based adult population segmentation tools in PubMed, CINAHL and Web of Science databases. We included tools comprising mutually exclusive segments with prognostic value for clinically relevant outcomes. An updated secondary search on the PubMed database was also conducted as the last search was conducted 2 years ago. All identified tools were characterized in terms of segment formulation, segmentation base, whether they received peer-reviewed validation, requirement for comprehensive electronic medical records, proprietary status and number of segments.

Results

A total of 16 unique tools were identified from systematically reviewing 9970 articles. Peer-reviewed validation studies were found for 9 of these tools.

Discussion and conclusions

The underlying segmentation basis of most identified tools was found to be conceptually comparable to each other which suggests a broad recognition of archetypical patient overall healthcare need profiles. While many tools operate based on administrative record data, it is noted that healthcare systems without comprehensive electronic medical records would benefit from tools which segment populations through primary data collection. Future work could therefore include development and validation of such primary data collection-based tools. While this study is limited by exclusion of non-English literature, the identified and characterized tools will nonetheless facilitate efforts by policymakers to improve patient-centred care through development and evaluation of services tailored for specific populations segmented by these tools.
dc.identifier

10.1186/s13643-019-1105-6

dc.identifier.issn

2046-4053

dc.identifier.issn

2046-4053

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/22781

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

dc.relation.ispartof

Systematic reviews

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1186/s13643-019-1105-6

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Health Care Reform

dc.subject

Health Planning

dc.subject

Health Services Needs and Demand

dc.subject

Efficiency, Organizational

dc.subject

Patient-Centered Care

dc.subject

Delivery of Health Care, Integrated

dc.subject

Electronic Health Records

dc.subject

Population Health

dc.title

Population segmentation based on healthcare needs: a systematic review.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Matchar, David Bruce|0000-0003-3020-2108

pubs.begin-page

202

pubs.issue

1

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Global Health Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Pathology

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

8

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Population segmentation based on healthcare needs a systematic review.pdf
Size:
1.3 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format