The Impact of Peri-operative Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols on Outcomes Following Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery.

dc.contributor.author

Tretiakov, Peter S

dc.contributor.author

Onafowokan, Oluwatobi O

dc.contributor.author

Mir, Jamshaid M

dc.contributor.author

Lorentz, Nathan

dc.contributor.author

Galetta, Matthew

dc.contributor.author

Das, Ankita

dc.contributor.author

Shin, John

dc.contributor.author

Sciubba, Daniel

dc.contributor.author

Krol, Oscar

dc.contributor.author

Joujon-Roche, Rachel

dc.contributor.author

Williamson, Tyler

dc.contributor.author

Imbo, Bailey

dc.contributor.author

Yee, Timothy

dc.contributor.author

Jankowski, Pawel P

dc.contributor.author

Hockley, Aaron

dc.contributor.author

Schoenfeld, Andrew J

dc.contributor.author

Passias, Peter G

dc.date.accessioned

2024-12-05T16:24:51Z

dc.date.available

2024-12-05T16:24:51Z

dc.date.issued

2024-04

dc.description.abstract

Study design

Retrospective cohort study.

Objectives

To assess the impact of Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols on peri-operative course in adult cervical deformity (ACD) corrective surgery.

Methods

Patients ≥18 yrs with complete pre-(BL) and up to 2-year (2Y) radiographic and clinical outcome data were stratified by enrollment in an ERAS protocol that commenced in 2020. Differences in demographics, clinical outcomes, radiographic alignment targets, peri-operative factors and complication rates were assessed via means comparison analysis. Logistic regression analysed differences while controlling for baseline disability and deformity.

Results

We included 220 patients (average age 58.1 ± 11.9 years, 48% female). 20% were treated using the ERAS protocol (ERAS+). Disability was similar between both groups at baseline. When controlling for baseline disability and myelopathy, ERAS- patients were more likely to utilize opioids than ERAS+ (OR 1.79, 95% CI: 1.45-2.50, P = .016). Peri-operatively, ERAS+ had significantly lower operative time (P < .021), lower EBL (583.48 vs 246.51, P < .001), and required significantly lower doses of propofol intra-operatively than ERAS- patients (P = .020). ERAS+ patients also reported lower mean LOS overall (4.33 vs 5.84, P = .393), and were more likely to be discharged directly to home (χ2(1) = 4.974, P = .028). ERAS+ patients were less likely to require steroids after surgery (P = .045), were less likely to develop neuromuscular complications overall (P = .025), and less likely experience venous complications or be diagnosed with venous disease post-operatively (P = .025).

Conclusions

Enhanced recovery after surgery programs in ACD surgery demonstrate significant benefit in terms of peri-operative outcomes for patients.
dc.identifier.issn

2192-5682

dc.identifier.issn

2192-5690

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/31749

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

SAGE Publications

dc.relation.ispartof

Global spine journal

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1177/21925682241249105

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

adult cervical deformity

dc.subject

cervical spine

dc.subject

enhanced recovery after surgery

dc.subject

spine surgery

dc.title

The Impact of Peri-operative Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols on Outcomes Following Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Passias, Peter G|0000-0002-1479-4070|0000-0003-2635-2226

pubs.begin-page

21925682241249105

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10.1177_21925682241249105.pdf
Size:
931.9 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format