Clerkship Grading and the U.S. Economy: What Medical Education Can Learn From America’s Economic History

Loading...

Date

2021-02

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

3
views
3
downloads

Citation Stats

Attention Stats

Abstract

<jats:p>Clerkship grades (like money) are a social construct that function as the currency through which value exchanges in medical education are negotiated between the system’s various stakeholders. They provide a widely recognizable and efficient medium through which learner development can be assessed, tracked, compared, and demonstrated and are commonly used to make decisions regarding progression, distinction, and selection for residency. However, substantial literature has demonstrated how grades imprecisely and unreliably reflect the value of learners. In this article, the authors suggest that challenges with clerkship grades are fundamentally tied to their role as currency in the medical education system. Associations are drawn between clerkship grades and the history of the U.S. economy; 2 major concepts are highlighted: regulation and stock prices. The authors describe the history of these economic concepts and how they relate to challenges in clerkship grading. Using lessons learned from the history of the U.S. economy, the authors then propose a 2-step solution to improve upon grading for future generations of medical students: (1) transition from grades to a federally regulated competency-based assessment model and (2) development of a departmental competency letter that incorporates competency-based assessments rather than letter grades and meets the needs of program directors.</jats:p>

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1097/acm.0000000000003566

Publication Info

Ryan, Michael S, E Marshall Brooks, Komal Safdar and Sally A Santen (2021). Clerkship Grading and the U.S. Economy: What Medical Education Can Learn From America’s Economic History. Academic Medicine, 96(2). pp. 186–192. 10.1097/acm.0000000000003566 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/33442.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.