Revealing Hearing Loss: A Survey of How People Verbally Disclose Their Hearing Loss.

Loading...

Date

2016-03

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Citation Stats

Attention Stats

Abstract

Objective

Hearing loss is the most common sensory deficit and congenital anomaly, yet the decision-making processes involved in disclosing hearing loss have been little studied. To address this issue, we have explored the phrases that adults with hearing loss use to disclose their hearing loss.

Design

Since self-disclosure research has not focused on hearing loss-specific issues, we created a 15-question survey about verbally disclosing hearing loss. English speaking adults (>18 years old) with hearing loss of any etiology were recruited from otology clinics in a major referral hospital. Three hundred and thirty-seven participants completed the survey instrument. Participants' phrase(s) used to tell people they have hearing loss were compared across objective characteristics (age; sex; type, degree, and laterality of hearing loss; word recognition scores) and self-reported characteristics (degree of hearing loss; age of onset and years lived with hearing loss; use of technology; hearing handicap score).

Results

Participants' responses revealed three strategies to address hearing loss: Multipurpose disclosure (phrases that disclose hearing loss and provide information to facilitate communication), Basic disclosure (phrases that disclose hearing loss through the term, a label, or details about the condition), or nondisclosure (phrases that do not disclose hearing loss). Variables were compared between patients who used and who did not use each disclosure strategy using χ or Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Multipurpose disclosers were mostly female (p = 0.002); had experienced reactions of help, support, and accommodation after disclosing (p = 0.008); and had experienced reactions of being overly helpful after disclosing (p=0.039). Basic disclosers were predominantly male (p = 0.004); reported feeling somewhat more comfortable disclosing their hearing loss over time (p = 0.009); had not experienced reactions of being treated unfairly or discriminated against (p = 0.021); and were diagnosed with mixed hearing loss (p = 0.004). Nondisclosers tended not to disclose in a group setting (p = 0.002) and were diagnosed with bilateral hearing loss (p = 0.005). In addition, all of the variables were examined to build logistic regression models to predict the use of each disclosure strategy.

Conclusions

Our results reveal three simple strategies for verbally addressing hearing loss that can be used in a variety of contexts. We recommend educating people with hearing loss about these strategies-this could improve the experience of disclosing hearing loss, and could educate society at large about how to interact with those who have a hearing loss.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Humans, Hearing Loss, Severity of Illness Index, Logistic Models, Communication, Self Disclosure, Decision Making, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Middle Aged, Female, Male, Young Adult, Surveys and Questionnaires

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1097/aud.0000000000000238

Publication Info

West, Jessica S, Jacob CM Low and Konstantina M Stankovic (2016). Revealing Hearing Loss: A Survey of How People Verbally Disclose Their Hearing Loss. Ear and hearing, 37(2). pp. 194–205. 10.1097/aud.0000000000000238 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/28654.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Scholars@Duke

West

Jessica Sayles West

Assistant Professor of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences

Jessica is a medical sociologist whose research examines hearing loss stigma, aging, and health disparities across the life course. Her work integrates sociological theory, population health sciences, and hearing healthcare to understand how hearing loss and hearing-related stigma shape mental health, social relationships, healthcare experiences, and quality of life among diverse populations. Jessica has documented the broader consequences of hearing loss for individuals and families, identified sociodemographic disparities in hearing health, and helped advance the measurement of hearing loss stigma. Supported by a National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) K01 Career Development Award, her current research program focuses on documenting, measuring, and reducing stigma associated with hearing loss to improve health outcomes and advance hearing health equity. Her research has been published in leading journals including, the Journals of Gerontology, Social Science & Medicine, Ear and Hearing, and other prominent outlets in medical sociology, population health, audiology, and aging research.

Jessica received a B.A. from the University of Michigan in Social Anthropology (dual Sociology/Anthropology concentration) followed by an M.P.H. in Sociomedical Sciences with a certificate in Public Health Research Methods from Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health. She subsequently received an M.A. and Ph.D. in Sociology with a focus in Medical Sociology and Demography at Duke University. She then completed an NIA T32 Postdoctoral Fellowship at the Duke University Aging Center. She is currently an Assistant Professor in Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences at the Duke University School of Medicine, a Faculty Research Scholar in the Duke University Population Research Institute, and a Senior Fellow in the Duke University Aging Center.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.