Enfranchisement and Incarceration after the 1965 Voting Rights Act

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2022-01-20

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

118
views
127
downloads

Citation Stats

Abstract

<jats:p>The 1965 Voting Rights Act (VRA) fundamentally changed the distribution of electoral power in the US South. We examine the consequences of this mass enfranchisement of Black people for the use of the carceral state—police, the courts, and the prison system. We study the extent to which white communities in the US South responded to the end of Jim Crow by increasing the incarceration of Black people. We test this with new historical data on state and county prison intake data by race (~1940–1985) in a series of difference-in-differences designs. We find that states covered by Section 5 of the VRA experienced a differential increase in Black prison admissions relative to those that were not covered and that incarceration varied systematically in proportion to the electoral threat posed by Black voters. Our findings indicate the potentially perverse consequences of enfranchisement when establishment power seeks—and finds—other outlets of social and political control.</jats:p>

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1017/s0003055421001337

Publication Info

Eubank, N, and A Fresh (2022). Enfranchisement and Incarceration after the 1965 Voting Rights Act. American Political Science Review. pp. 1–16. 10.1017/s0003055421001337 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/24304.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Eubank

Nicholas Eubank

Assistant Research Professor of Political Science

I am an Assistant Research Professor in the Duke Social Science Research Institute (SSRI), where I study a range of topics related to political accountability, include gerrymandering, social networks, election administration and race and incarceration.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.