Implementation challenges to patient safety in Guatemala: a mixed methods evaluation.

dc.contributor.author

Hall, Bria J

dc.contributor.author

Puente, Melany

dc.contributor.author

Aguilar, Angie

dc.contributor.author

Sico, Isabelle

dc.contributor.author

Orozco Barrios, Monica

dc.contributor.author

Mendez, Sindy

dc.contributor.author

Baumgartner, Joy Noel

dc.contributor.author

Boyd, David

dc.contributor.author

Calgua, Erwin

dc.contributor.author

Lou-Meda, Randall

dc.contributor.author

Ramirez, Carla C

dc.contributor.author

Diez, Ana

dc.contributor.author

Tello, Astrid

dc.contributor.author

Sexton, J Bryan

dc.contributor.author

Rice, Henry

dc.date.accessioned

2021-09-01T13:55:45Z

dc.date.available

2021-09-01T13:55:45Z

dc.date.issued

2021-05-26

dc.date.updated

2021-09-01T13:55:44Z

dc.description.abstract

Background

Little is known about factors affecting implementation of patient safety programmes in low and middle-income countries. The goal of our study was to evaluate the implementation of a patient safety programme for paediatric care in Guatemala.

Methods

We used a mixed methods design to examine the implementation of a patient safety programme across 11 paediatric units at the Roosevelt Hospital in Guatemala. The safety programme included: (1) tools to measure and foster safety culture, (2) education of patient safety, (3) local leadership engagement, (4) safety event reporting systems, and (5) quality improvement interventions. Key informant staff (n=82) participated in qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys to identify implementation challenges early during programme deployment from May to July 2018, with follow-up focus group discussions in two units 1 year later to identify opportunities for programme modification. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, and integrated using triangulation, complementarity and expansion to identify emerging themes using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Salience levels were reported according to coding frequency, with valence levels measured to characterise the degree to which each construct impacted implementation.

Results

We found several facilitators to safety programme implementation, including high staff receptivity, orientation towards patient-centredness and a desire for protocols. Key barriers included competing clinical demands, lack of knowledge about patient safety, limited governance, human factors and poor organisational incentives. Modifications included use of tools for staff recognition, integration of education into error reporting mechanisms and designation of trained champions to lead unit-based safety interventions.

Conclusion

Implementation of safety programmes in low-resource settings requires recognition of facilitators such as staff receptivity and patient-centredness as well as barriers such as lack of training in patient safety and poor organisational incentives. Embedding an implementation analysis during programme deployment allows for programme modification to enhance successful implementation.
dc.identifier

bmjqs-2020-012552

dc.identifier.issn

2044-5415

dc.identifier.issn

2044-5423

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23673

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

BMJ

dc.relation.ispartof

BMJ quality & safety

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012552

dc.subject

health services research

dc.subject

implementation science

dc.subject

paediatrics

dc.subject

patient safety

dc.title

Implementation challenges to patient safety in Guatemala: a mixed methods evaluation.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Sexton, J Bryan|0000-0002-0578-2924

duke.contributor.orcid

Rice, Henry|0000-0001-8033-6687

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, General Psychiatry

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Global Health Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Pediatrics

pubs.organisational-group

Surgery, Pediatric General Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Institute for Brain Sciences

pubs.publication-status

Published

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
impletmentation challenges PS cult Guatemala bmjqs-2020-012552.full.pdf
Size:
1.37 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format