What is the average time frame of clinically meaningful improvement in surgical decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data: 5-year follow-up.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the time frame of clinical improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following surgical decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Based on previously published 12-month data from this group, the authors hypothesized that the average time to minimal clinically important difference (MCID) improvement would primarily occur by 3 months postoperatively regardless of preoperative myelopathy severity. They also hypothesized that there would be minimal additional improvement between 3 months and 5 years after surgery. This was a post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from the 14-site Spine CORe™ study group of the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD). Patients were stratified according to myelopathy severity using the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) myelopathy scale into mild (mJOA score 15-17), moderate (mJOA score 12-14) or severe (mJOA score < 12). PRO measures included the Neck Disability Index (NDI), numeric rating scale (NRS) for neck and arm pain, and EQ-5D for quality-adjusted life years. PROs were recorded at baseline, 3-month, 12-month, 2-year, and 5-year intervals. MCID thresholds were calculated using previously validated methods in this cohort. Time to meet the MCID cutoff and the proportion of patients achieving MCID at each time point were determined. A total of 1085 patients (with ≥ 80% follow-up at 60 months for all PRO measures [PROMs]) were enrolled. Patients with more severe myelopathy had worse baseline comorbidities (e.g., BMI, American Society of Anesthesiology class, ambulation dependence) and lower PRO scores. Average PROs met the MCID threshold in each category at 3 months postoperatively, regardless of baseline myelopathy severity. Of the patients with complete 5-year follow-up data, the majority achieved the MCID cutoff threshold for PROMs at 3 months (50%-73%, depending on the PROM). A minority of patients went on to meet the MCID for PROMs at 12 months (12%-21%), 2 years (4%-8%), and 5 years (1%-6%). Between 4% and 25% of patients never achieved MCID cutoffs at any time point. On average, patients achieved clinically meaningful improvement in PROs at 3 months postoperatively, regardless of preoperative severity. While the majority (50%-73%, depending on the PROM) reached MCID within 3 months, an additional 12%-21% improved by 12 months, 4%-8% by 2 years, and only 1%-6% by 5 years; 4%-25% never reach the MCID. This 5-year follow-up study clarifies the timeline of clinical improvement after surgery for CSM and provides a useful tool for both surgeon planning and patient counseling.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Cervical Vertebrae, Humans, Spinal Cord Diseases, Treatment Outcome, Decompression, Surgical, Follow-Up Studies, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Quality of Life, Aged, Middle Aged, Female, Male, Spondylosis, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Minimal Clinically Important Difference

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.3171/2025.12.focus25943

Publication Info

Berlin, Connor, Izza Tahir, Nicholas Cassimatis, Maliya Delawan, Gracie Garcia, Ben Setaro, Praveen V Mummaneni, Andrew K Chan, et al. (2026). What is the average time frame of clinically meaningful improvement in surgical decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data: 5-year follow-up. Neurosurgical focus, 60(5). p. E11. 10.3171/2025.12.focus25943 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/34621.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Shaffrey

Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey

Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery

I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex spinal disorders. My patient evaluation and management philosophy is to provide engaged, compassionate care that focuses on providing the simplest and least aggressive treatment option for a particular condition. In many cases, non-operative treatment options exist to improve a patient’s symptoms. I have been actively engaged in clinical research to find the best ways to manage spinal disorders in order to achieve better results with fewer complications.

Gottfried

Oren N Gottfried

Professor of Neurosurgery

I specialize in the surgical management of all complex cervical, thoracic, lumbar, or sacral spinal diseases by using minimally invasive as well as standard approaches for arthritis or degenerative disease, deformity, tumors, and trauma. I have a special interest in the treatment of thoracolumbar deformities, occipital-cervical problems, and in helping patients with complex spinal issues from previously unsuccessful surgery or recurrent disease.I listen to my patients to understand their symptoms and experiences so I can provide them with the information and education they need to manage their disease. I make sure my patients understand their treatment options, and what will work best for their individual condition. I treat all my patients with care and concern – just as I would treat my family. I am available to address my patients' concerns before and after surgery.  I aim to improve surgical outcomes for my patients and care of all spine patients with active research evaluating clinical and radiological results after spine surgery with multiple prospective databases. I am particularly interested in prevention of spinal deformity, infections, complications, and recurrent spinal disease. Also, I study whether patient specific variables including pelvic/sacral anatomy and sagittal spinal balance predict complications from spine surgery.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.