What is the average time frame of clinically meaningful improvement in surgical decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data: 5-year follow-up.

dc.contributor.author

Berlin, Connor

dc.contributor.author

Tahir, Izza

dc.contributor.author

Cassimatis, Nicholas

dc.contributor.author

Delawan, Maliya

dc.contributor.author

Garcia, Gracie

dc.contributor.author

Setaro, Ben

dc.contributor.author

Mummaneni, Praveen V

dc.contributor.author

Chan, Andrew K

dc.contributor.author

Chou, Dean

dc.contributor.author

Fu, Kai-Ming

dc.contributor.author

Bisson, Erica F

dc.contributor.author

Shaffrey, Christopher I

dc.contributor.author

Gottfried, Oren N

dc.contributor.author

Asher, Anthony L

dc.contributor.author

Kim, Paul K

dc.contributor.author

Potts, Eric A

dc.contributor.author

Alentado, Vincent J

dc.contributor.author

Foley, Kevin T

dc.contributor.author

Wang, Michael Y

dc.contributor.author

Virk, Michael S

dc.contributor.author

Knightly, John J

dc.contributor.author

Meyer, Scott

dc.contributor.author

Park, Paul

dc.contributor.author

Upadhyaya, Cheerag D

dc.contributor.author

Tumialán, Luis M

dc.contributor.author

Turner, Jay D

dc.contributor.author

Uribe, Juan S

dc.contributor.author

Haid, Regis W

dc.contributor.author

Yee, Timothy J

dc.contributor.author

Bydon, Mohamad

dc.contributor.author

Yen, Chun-Po

dc.date.accessioned

2026-05-05T15:00:28Z

dc.date.available

2026-05-05T15:00:28Z

dc.date.issued

2026-05

dc.description.abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the time frame of clinical improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following surgical decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Based on previously published 12-month data from this group, the authors hypothesized that the average time to minimal clinically important difference (MCID) improvement would primarily occur by 3 months postoperatively regardless of preoperative myelopathy severity. They also hypothesized that there would be minimal additional improvement between 3 months and 5 years after surgery. This was a post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from the 14-site Spine CORe™ study group of the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD). Patients were stratified according to myelopathy severity using the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) myelopathy scale into mild (mJOA score 15-17), moderate (mJOA score 12-14) or severe (mJOA score < 12). PRO measures included the Neck Disability Index (NDI), numeric rating scale (NRS) for neck and arm pain, and EQ-5D for quality-adjusted life years. PROs were recorded at baseline, 3-month, 12-month, 2-year, and 5-year intervals. MCID thresholds were calculated using previously validated methods in this cohort. Time to meet the MCID cutoff and the proportion of patients achieving MCID at each time point were determined. A total of 1085 patients (with ≥ 80% follow-up at 60 months for all PRO measures [PROMs]) were enrolled. Patients with more severe myelopathy had worse baseline comorbidities (e.g., BMI, American Society of Anesthesiology class, ambulation dependence) and lower PRO scores. Average PROs met the MCID threshold in each category at 3 months postoperatively, regardless of baseline myelopathy severity. Of the patients with complete 5-year follow-up data, the majority achieved the MCID cutoff threshold for PROMs at 3 months (50%-73%, depending on the PROM). A minority of patients went on to meet the MCID for PROMs at 12 months (12%-21%), 2 years (4%-8%), and 5 years (1%-6%). Between 4% and 25% of patients never achieved MCID cutoffs at any time point. On average, patients achieved clinically meaningful improvement in PROs at 3 months postoperatively, regardless of preoperative severity. While the majority (50%-73%, depending on the PROM) reached MCID within 3 months, an additional 12%-21% improved by 12 months, 4%-8% by 2 years, and only 1%-6% by 5 years; 4%-25% never reach the MCID. This 5-year follow-up study clarifies the timeline of clinical improvement after surgery for CSM and provides a useful tool for both surgeon planning and patient counseling.

dc.identifier.issn

1092-0684

dc.identifier.issn

1092-0684

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/34621

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

dc.relation.ispartof

Neurosurgical focus

dc.relation.isversionof

10.3171/2025.12.focus25943

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

Cervical Vertebrae

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Spinal Cord Diseases

dc.subject

Treatment Outcome

dc.subject

Decompression, Surgical

dc.subject

Follow-Up Studies

dc.subject

Prospective Studies

dc.subject

Time Factors

dc.subject

Quality of Life

dc.subject

Aged

dc.subject

Middle Aged

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Male

dc.subject

Spondylosis

dc.subject

Patient Reported Outcome Measures

dc.subject

Minimal Clinically Important Difference

dc.title

What is the average time frame of clinically meaningful improvement in surgical decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data: 5-year follow-up.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Shaffrey, Christopher I|0000-0001-9760-8386

pubs.begin-page

E11

pubs.issue

5

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

60

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
neurosurg-focus-article-pE11.pdf
Size:
9.8 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format