What controls connectivity? An empirical, multi-species approach.
Date
2012-10
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Citation Stats
Attention Stats
Abstract
The exchange of individuals among habitat patches (connectivity) has broad relevance for the conservation and management of marine metapopulations. Elemental fingerprinting-based research conducted over the past 12 years along the open coastline and bays of San Diego County in southern California evaluated connectivity patterns for seven species: one native and two invasive mussels, an oyster, a brachyuran crab, and two fishes. The studies spanned different years and seasons but overlapped considerably in space, allowing comparisons of dispersal patterns across species, and assessment of the relative importance of location, circulation, and intra-annual and inter-annual variability. We asked whether the species exhibited commonalities in directional transport, transport distances, sources and sinks, self-recruitment, and bay-ocean exchange. Linked connectivity-demographic analyses conducted for two species of mytilid mussels and two fishes allowed evaluation of the contributions of realized connectivity to metapopulation dynamics relative to other life-history attributes. Common trends across species include average along-shore dispersal distances of 15-35 km and seasonal changes in direction of dispersal that mirrored patterns of along-shore circulation. We observed greater isolation of back-bay populations, significant exchange from front bay to ocean, and high self-recruitment in locations on the northern, open coast, and in the southern bays. Connectivity was rarely the most influential driver of growth and persistence of metapopulations, but influenced the importance of other vital rates. Several locations served consistently as sources of larvae or as nurseries for multiple species, but there were few sites in common that were sinks. For the mussels, reproductive timing guided directional transport. These results imply that local management (e.g., habitat protection, opening of the mouths of lagoons, location of aquaculture farms) may be effective along this coastline. Regional, multi-species assessments of exchange of larvae should move us closer to ecosystem-based management.
Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Subjects
Citation
Permalink
Published Version (Please cite this version)
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Scholars@Duke
Joel Fodrie
Our laboratory group studies the population dynamics of fishes and shellfishes, as well as the community ecology of estuarine systems. Our team’s funded/published research has emphasized: (1) quantifying connectivity among marine populations and ecosystems; (2) understanding the long-term effects of pulse and press disturbances using coastal fishes as a model system; (3) exploring the natural history, restoration ecology, and climate response of coastal habitats such as oyster reefs and seagrass meadows; (4) investigating the landscape ecology of seagrass meadows; and (5) the ecosystem and socioeconomic dynamics of expanding shellfish mariculture operations. Since 2010, we have also served as the primary caretaker of the Cape Lookout long-term shark survey based out of the Institute of Marine Sciences. I have contributed ~115 peer-reviewed papers that explore mechanisms of population and community variability within coastal ecosystems. These articles appear in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Ecology, and BioScience. Over the last decade, our team has become increasingly engaged in coastal resource management in North Carolina.
Material is made available in this collection at the direction of authors according to their understanding of their rights in that material. You may download and use these materials in any manner not prohibited by copyright or other applicable law.