A Field of Her Own: Property Rights and Women's Agency in Myanmar.

Loading...

Date

2026-01

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

7
views
9
downloads

Citation Stats

Attention Stats

Abstract

Can financial incentives lead households to register land in women's names, thereby providing them with formal property rights? Can formal property ownership improve women's economic outcomes and change decision-making dynamics within the household? To investigate these questions, we take advantage of a bank lending policy in Myanmar that motivated households with land holdings above ten acres to title the surplus land in their wives' names. We surveyed 5,068 men and women in Myanmar about land ownership, economic activity, and gendered decision-making. We find that the financial incentives provided by the bank lending policy led to increases in women's formal property ownership, but these exogenously assigned rights did not manifest broadly into greater economic empowerment or decision-making power for recipients. We provide suggestive evidence that local cultural norms are a significant constraint for women to achieve empowerment through formal land rights.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Myanmar, land rights, lending policy, regression discontinuity, ten acres, women’s empowerment

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1086/734236

Publication Info

Fertig, Alexander, Alexandra Hartman, Lakshmi Iyer and Edmund Malesky (2026). A Field of Her Own: Property Rights and Women's Agency in Myanmar. The journal of politics, 88(1). pp. 192–204. 10.1086/734236 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/34661.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Malesky

Edmund Malesky

Oscar L. Tang Family Distinguished Professor of Political Science

Malesky is a specialist on Southeast Asia, particularly Vietnam. Currently, Malesky's research agenda is very much at the intersection of Comparative and International Political Economy, falling into three major categories: 1) Authoritarian political institutions and their consequences; 2) The political influence of foreign direct investment and multinational corporations; and 3) Political institutions, private business development, and formalization.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.