NCOG-43. A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 INFECTION ON NEURO-ONCOLOGY CARE AND PATIENT OUTCOMES: A TWO-SITE STUDY

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:title>BACKGROUND</jats:title> <jats:p>COVID-19 radically changed neuro-oncology care. In this retrospective study, we examine the impact of COVID-19 infection on neuro-oncological care and clinical outcomes in two geographically separate populations.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>METHODS</jats:title> <jats:p>Descriptive statistics compared demographic and clinical history extracted from the medical records of COVID-19 positive patients with primary brain tumors treated between 3/1/2020 and 3/31/2021. All subjects were unvaccinated given our cohort pre-dates the ubiquitous availability of vaccines. Patients were treated at Washington University (WashU) in St. Louis, MO and Duke University in Durham, NC. Each site’s respective institutional review board approved the study, with a data transfer agreement in place.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>RESULTS</jats:title> <jats:p>We identified 62 total (WashU=13; Duke=49) subjects with positive COVID-19 infection. Patients were predominantly white (85.5%), male (56.5%), with KPS &gt;=70 (82.3%) and never smoked (69.4%). WashU patients tended to be older with grade 4 tumors, but this was not significant. At the time of COVID infection 35.5% of patients were receiving cancer-directed therapy. Notably, 37.1% experienced delayed care due to a COVID-19 diagnosis, most often for scheduled systemic treatment or radiation treatment. A further 37.1% had an ER visit, hospitalization, or ICU stay attributed to COVID-19. Of the 17 patients who died during the study period, 4 deaths were attributed directly to COVID-19 and not to their underlying brain tumor or other cause. Finally, telehealth use differed between sites (84.6% at WashU vs 14.3% at Duke). However, this difference could not be attributed to patient age, performance status, or distance from treating institution.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>CONCLUSION</jats:title> <jats:p>COVID-19 infection led to treatment delays and death for a subset, but not the majority of neuro-oncology patients. Telehealth use varied between sites and was not associated with commonly held assumptions about patient distance or performance status, suggesting evolving practice norms following telehealth’s introduction. Study limitations include a small sample size</jats:p> </jats:sec>

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1093/neuonc/noac209.794

Publication Info

Johnson, Margaret, Jennifer Durling, Casey B Brown, Mustafa Khasraw, Zoey Petitt, Nicole Cort, Eric S Lipp, Evan D Buckley, et al. (2022). NCOG-43. A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 INFECTION ON NEURO-ONCOLOGY CARE AND PATIENT OUTCOMES: A TWO-SITE STUDY. Neuro-Oncology, 24(Supplement_7). pp. vii206–vii207. 10.1093/neuonc/noac209.794 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/33200.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Johnson

Margaret Johnson

Associate Professor of Neurosurgery

I am a neuro-oncologist, neurologist, and palliative care physician at the Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center. I also provide neuro-oncology expertise for the National Tele-Oncology Program and National Precision Oncology Program at the Veteran's Health Administration. My clinical and research interests encompass supportive care and palliative care with a special interest in older adults with brain tumors. The incidence of malignant brain tumors like glioblastoma and non-malignant tumors like meningioma affect aging populations and it is crucial to be able to provide better care for these patients. 


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.