Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors.

dc.contributor.author

Bent, Brinnae

dc.contributor.author

Goldstein, Benjamin A

dc.contributor.author

Kibbe, Warren A

dc.contributor.author

Dunn, Jessilyn P

dc.date.accessioned

2020-02-25T16:20:10Z

dc.date.available

2020-02-25T16:20:10Z

dc.date.issued

2020-01

dc.date.updated

2020-02-25T16:20:08Z

dc.description.abstract

As wearable technologies are being increasingly used for clinical research and healthcare, it is critical to understand their accuracy and determine how measurement errors may affect research conclusions and impact healthcare decision-making. Accuracy of wearable technologies has been a hotly debated topic in both the research and popular science literature. Currently, wearable technology companies are responsible for assessing and reporting the accuracy of their products, but little information about the evaluation method is made publicly available. Heart rate measurements from wearables are derived from photoplethysmography (PPG), an optical method for measuring changes in blood volume under the skin. Potential inaccuracies in PPG stem from three major areas, includes (1) diverse skin types, (2) motion artifacts, and (3) signal crossover. To date, no study has systematically explored the accuracy of wearables across the full range of skin tones. Here, we explored heart rate and PPG data from consumer- and research-grade wearables under multiple circumstances to test whether and to what extent these inaccuracies exist. We saw no statistically significant difference in accuracy across skin tones, but we saw significant differences between devices, and between activity types, notably, that absolute error during activity was, on average, 30% higher than during rest. Our conclusions indicate that different wearables are all reasonably accurate at resting and prolonged elevated heart rate, but that differences exist between devices in responding to changes in activity. This has implications for researchers, clinicians, and consumers in drawing study conclusions, combining study results, and making health-related decisions using these devices.

dc.identifier

226

dc.identifier.issn

2398-6352

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/20231

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

dc.relation.ispartof

NPJ digital medicine

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1038/s41746-020-0226-6

dc.subject

Biomedical engineering

dc.subject

Imaging and sensing

dc.subject

Technology

dc.title

Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Bent, Brinnae|0000-0002-7039-0177

duke.contributor.orcid

Goldstein, Benjamin A|0000-0001-5261-3632

duke.contributor.orcid

Kibbe, Warren A|0000-0001-5622-7659

duke.contributor.orcid

Dunn, Jessilyn P|0000-0002-3241-8183

pubs.begin-page

18

pubs.issue

1

pubs.organisational-group

Student

pubs.organisational-group

Biomedical Engineering

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Pratt School of Engineering

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

3

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
npj_STEP.pdf
Size:
1.16 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format