Quantification of Peat Thickness and Stored Carbon at the Landscape Scale in Tropical Peatlands: A Comparison of Airborne Geophysics and an Empirical Topographic Method

dc.contributor.author

Silvestri, S

dc.contributor.author

Knight, R

dc.contributor.author

Viezzoli, A

dc.contributor.author

Richardson, CJ

dc.contributor.author

Anshari, GZ

dc.contributor.author

Dewar, N

dc.contributor.author

Flanagan, N

dc.contributor.author

Comas, X

dc.date.accessioned

2020-04-02T09:43:39Z

dc.date.available

2020-04-02T09:43:39Z

dc.date.issued

2019-12-01

dc.date.updated

2020-04-02T09:41:12Z

dc.description.abstract

©2019. The Authors. Peatlands play a key role in the global carbon cycle, sequestering and releasing large amounts of carbon. Despite their importance, a reliable method for the quantification of peatland thickness and volume is still missing, particularly for peat deposits located in the tropics given their limited accessibility, and for scales of measurement representative of peatland environments (i.e., of hundreds of km2). This limitation also prevents the accurate quantification of the stored carbon as well as future greenhouse gas emissions due to ongoing peat degradation. Here we present the results obtained using the airborne electromagnetic (AEM) method, a geophysical surveying tool, for peat thickness detection at the landscape scale. Based on a large amount of data collected on an Indonesian peatland, our results show that the AEM method provides a reliable and accurate 3-D model of peatlands, allowing the quantification of their volume and carbon storage. A comparison with the often used empirical topographic approach, which is based on an assumed correlation between peat thickness and surface topography, revealed larger errors across the landscape associated with the empirical approach than the AEM method when predicting the peat thickness. As a result, the AEM method provides higher estimates (22%) of organic carbon pools than the empirical method. We show how in our case study the empirical method tends to underestimate the peat thickness due to its inability to accurately detect the large variability in the elevation of the peat/mineral substrate interface, which is better quantified by the AEM method.

dc.identifier.issn

2169-9003

dc.identifier.issn

2169-9011

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/20360

dc.language

en

dc.publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1029/2019JF005273

dc.subject

Science & Technology

dc.subject

Physical Sciences

dc.subject

Geosciences, Multidisciplinary

dc.subject

Geology

dc.subject

peatlands

dc.subject

airborne geophysics

dc.subject

organic carbon

dc.subject

peatland topography

dc.subject

GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR

dc.subject

RESISTIVITY IMAGING ERI

dc.subject

ELECTROMAGNETIC DATA

dc.subject

INDONESIA

dc.subject

LIMITS

dc.subject

SWAMP

dc.subject

STRATIGRAPHY

dc.subject

KALIMANTAN

dc.subject

INVERSION

dc.subject

BOREHOLE

dc.title

Quantification of Peat Thickness and Stored Carbon at the Landscape Scale in Tropical Peatlands: A Comparison of Airborne Geophysics and an Empirical Topographic Method

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Silvestri, S|0000-0002-5114-8633

pubs.begin-page

3107

pubs.end-page

3123

pubs.issue

12

pubs.organisational-group

Nicholas School of the Environment

pubs.organisational-group

Environmental Sciences and Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Earth and Ocean Sciences

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

124

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Silvestri_et_al_Peatlands-Indonesia_AEM_JGR-ES_2019.pdf
Size:
25.42 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version