Kickstand rods and correction of coronal malalignment in patients with adult spinal deformity.

dc.contributor.author

Mundis, Gregory M

dc.contributor.author

Walker, Corey T

dc.contributor.author

Smith, Justin S

dc.contributor.author

Buell, Thomas J

dc.contributor.author

Lafage, Renaud

dc.contributor.author

Shaffrey, Christopher I

dc.contributor.author

Eastlack, Robert K

dc.contributor.author

Okonkwo, David O

dc.contributor.author

Bess, Shay

dc.contributor.author

Lafage, Virginie

dc.contributor.author

Uribe, Juan S

dc.contributor.author

Lenke, Lawrence G

dc.contributor.author

Ames, Christopher P

dc.contributor.author

International Spine Study Group (ISSG)

dc.date.accessioned

2023-06-15T17:52:45Z

dc.date.available

2023-06-15T17:52:45Z

dc.date.issued

2022-05

dc.date.updated

2023-06-15T17:52:45Z

dc.description.abstract

Purpose

Coronal malalignment (CM) is a challenging spinal deformity to treat. The kickstand rod (KR) technique is powerful for correcting truncal shift. This study tested the hypothesis that the KR technique provides superior coronal alignment correction in adult deformity compared with traditional rod techniques.

Methods

A retrospective evaluation of a prospectively collected multicenter database was performed. A 2:1 matched cohort of non-KR accessory rod and KR patients was planned based on preoperative coronal balance distance (CBD) and a vector of global shift. Patients were subgrouped according to CM classification with a 30-mm CBD threshold defining CM, and comparisons of surgical and clinical outcomes among groups was performed.

Results

Twenty-one patients with preoperative CM treated with a KR were matched to 36 controls. KR-treated patients had improved CBD compared with controls (18 vs. 35 mm, P < 0.01). The postoperative CBD did not result in clinical differences between groups in patient-reported outcomes (P ≥ 0.09). Eight (38%) of 21 KR patients and 12 (33%) of 36 control patients with preoperative CM had persistent postoperative CM (P = 0.72). CM class did not significantly affect the likelihood of treatment failure (postoperative CBD > 30 mm) in the KR cohort (P = 0.70), the control cohort (P = 0.35), or the overall population (P = 0.31).

Conclusions

Application of the KR technique to coronal spinal deformity in adults allows for successful treatment of CM. Compared to traditional rod techniques, the use of KRs did not improve clinical outcome measures 1 year after spinal deformity surgery but was associated with better postoperative coronal alignment.
dc.identifier

10.1007/s00586-022-07161-7

dc.identifier.issn

0940-6719

dc.identifier.issn

1432-0932

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/28020

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

dc.relation.ispartof

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1007/s00586-022-07161-7

dc.subject

International Spine Study Group (ISSG)

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Scoliosis

dc.subject

Treatment Outcome

dc.subject

Spinal Fusion

dc.subject

Postoperative Period

dc.subject

Retrospective Studies

dc.subject

Cohort Studies

dc.subject

Adult

dc.title

Kickstand rods and correction of coronal malalignment in patients with adult spinal deformity.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Shaffrey, Christopher I|0000-0001-9760-8386

pubs.begin-page

1197

pubs.end-page

1205

pubs.issue

5

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

31

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Kickstand rods and correction of coronal malalignment in patients with adult spinal deformity.pdf
Size:
1.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format