Direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing.

dc.contributor.author

King, Dillon E

dc.contributor.author

Sparling, A Clare

dc.contributor.author

Joglekar, Rashmi

dc.contributor.author

Meyer, Joel N

dc.contributor.author

Murphy, Susan K

dc.date.accessioned

2021-09-01T13:30:36Z

dc.date.available

2021-09-01T13:30:36Z

dc.date.issued

2021-01

dc.date.updated

2021-09-01T13:30:34Z

dc.description.abstract

DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mechanism involved in proper genome function. Bisulfite pyrosequencing (PSQ) is a commonly used technique to quantify DNA methylation. Although very accurate, bisulfite pyrosequencing can be expensive and time consuming for large-scale quantitative DNA methylation analysis at the single nucleotide level. High throughput DNA methylation sequencing has the potential to address these limitations, but its comparability to other methylation detection methods has not been well studied. We compared QIAseq Targeted Methyl Panel technologies (QMS) and PSQ by analyzing four CpG sites within four genes involved in neurodevelopment. QMS and PSQ had an average 5.6% difference in the detected level of DNA methylation for the same four CpG sites. However, we observed a strong correlation in the levels of methylation across all four CpG sites between the two technologies. These findings demonstrate the comparability of QMS relative to PSQ in the ability to accurately quantify DNA methylation at specific CpG sites.

dc.identifier.issn

2578-9430

dc.identifier.issn

2578-9430

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23668

dc.language

eng

dc.relation.ispartof

microPublication biology

dc.relation.isversionof

10.17912/micropub.biology.000444

dc.title

Direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Meyer, Joel N|0000-0003-1219-0983

duke.contributor.orcid

Murphy, Susan K|0000-0001-8298-7272

pubs.organisational-group

Nicholas School of the Environment

pubs.organisational-group

Environmental Sciences and Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Global Health Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Pathology

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

2021

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing.pdf
Size:
795.96 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version