Short Paper: Can Robo-Advisors Replace Traditional Advisors?

dc.contributor.author

Wong, Eugene Lu Xian

dc.date.accessioned

2021-02-26T15:42:24Z

dc.date.available

2021-02-26T15:42:24Z

dc.date.issued

2021-02-18

dc.date.updated

2021-02-26T15:42:23Z

dc.description.abstract

Investment management was once an exclusivity that was only offered to the wealthy by human advisors. However, robo advisors are now offering low cost, readily accessible, fully automated services to a wider spectrum of users to manage their portfolios. The objective of this paper is to provide an insight on the differences between human and robo advisors, the advantages and trade offs in each advisor type, and the issues faced that are both common and yet unique to each. The author's analysis of robo advisors versus human advisors was conducted with reference to the following paper: "The Economics of Complex Decision Making: The Emergence of the Robo Adviser", published in August 2017.

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/22393

dc.subject

Robo-advisor

dc.subject

Wealth management

dc.subject

Financial advisory

dc.title

Short Paper: Can Robo-Advisors Replace Traditional Advisors?

dc.type

Report

duke.contributor.orcid

Wong, Eugene Lu Xian|0000-0003-2074-7374

pubs.organisational-group

Student

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Short_Paper__Can_Robo_Advisors_Replace_Traditional_Advisors_.pdf
Size:
63.8 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format