Personal identity and practical reason: The failure of Kantian replies to Parfit

dc.contributor.author

Anomaly, J

dc.date.accessioned

2014-02-26T08:43:35Z

dc.date.issued

2008-12-01

dc.description.abstract

This essay examines and criticizes a set of Kantian objections to Parfit's attempt in Reasons and Persons to connect his theory of personal identity to practical rationality and moral philosophy. Several of Parfit's critics have tried to sever the link he forges between his metaphysical and practical conclusions by invoking the Kantian thought that even if we accept his metaphysical theory of personal identity, we still have good practical grounds for rejecting that theory when deliberating about what to do. The argument between Parfit and his opponents illuminates broader questions about the relationship between our metaphysical beliefs and our practical reasons. © 2008 Canadian Philosophical Association.

dc.identifier.issn

0012-2173

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/8373

dc.publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

dc.relation.ispartof

Dialogue-Canadian Philosophical Review

dc.title

Personal identity and practical reason: The failure of Kantian replies to Parfit

dc.type

Journal article

pubs.begin-page

331

pubs.end-page

350

pubs.issue

2

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Political Science

pubs.organisational-group

Trinity College of Arts & Sciences

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

47

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Anomaly - PI and PR.pdf
Size:
619.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version