Remotely Sensed Data Informs Red List Evaluations and Conservation Priorities in Southeast Asia.

dc.contributor.author

Li, Binbin V

dc.contributor.author

Hughes, Alice C

dc.contributor.author

Jenkins, Clinton N

dc.contributor.author

Ocampo-Peñuela, Natalia

dc.contributor.author

Pimm, Stuart L

dc.contributor.editor

Baldwin, Robert F

dc.date.accessioned

2021-08-02T18:32:17Z

dc.date.available

2021-08-02T18:32:17Z

dc.date.issued

2016-01

dc.date.updated

2021-08-02T18:32:15Z

dc.description.abstract

The IUCN Red List has assessed the global distributions of the majority of the world's amphibians, birds and mammals. Yet these assessments lack explicit reference to widely available, remotely-sensed data that can sensibly inform a species' risk of extinction. Our first goal is to add additional quantitative data to the existing standardised process that IUCN employs. Secondly, we ask: do our results suggest species of concern-those at considerably greater risk than hitherto appreciated? Thirdly, these assessments are not only important on a species-by-species basis. By combining distributions of species of concern, we map conservation priorities. We ask to what degree these areas are currently protected and how might knowledge from remote sensing modify the priorities? Finally, we develop a quick and simple method to identify and modify the priority setting in a landscape where natural habitats are disappearing rapidly and so where conventional species' assessments might be too slow to respond. Tropical, mainland Southeast Asia is under exceptional threat, yet relatively poorly known. Here, additional quantitative measures may be particularly helpful. This region contains over 122, 183, and 214 endemic mammals, birds, and amphibians, respectively, of which the IUCN considers 37, 21, and 37 threatened. When corrected for the amount of remaining natural habitats within the known elevation preferences of species, the average sizes of species ranges shrink to <40% of their published ranges. Some 79 mammal, 49 bird, and 184 amphibian ranges are <20,000km2-an area at which IUCN considers most other species to be threatened. Moreover, these species are not better protected by the existing network of protected areas than are species that IUCN accepts as threatened. Simply, there appear to be considerably more species at risk than hitherto appreciated. Furthermore, incorporating remote sensing data showing where habitat loss is prevalent changes the locations of conservation priorities.

dc.identifier

PONE-D-16-13630

dc.identifier.issn

1932-6203

dc.identifier.issn

1932-6203

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23544

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

dc.relation.ispartof

PloS one

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1371/journal.pone.0160566

dc.subject

Animals

dc.subject

Birds

dc.subject

Mammals

dc.subject

Conservation of Natural Resources

dc.subject

Ecosystem

dc.subject

Environmental Monitoring

dc.subject

Research

dc.subject

Information Storage and Retrieval

dc.subject

Geographic Information Systems

dc.subject

Asia, Southeastern

dc.subject

Extinction, Biological

dc.subject

Amphibians

dc.subject

Endangered Species

dc.subject

Remote Sensing Technology

dc.title

Remotely Sensed Data Informs Red List Evaluations and Conservation Priorities in Southeast Asia.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Li, Binbin V|0000-0001-6188-7512

duke.contributor.orcid

Pimm, Stuart L|0000-0003-4206-2456

pubs.begin-page

e0160566

pubs.issue

8

pubs.organisational-group

Nicholas School of the Environment

pubs.organisational-group

Environmental Sciences and Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Kunshan University

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Kunshan University Faculty

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

11

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Remotely Sensed Data Informs Red List Evaluations and Conservation Priorities in Southeast Asia.pdf
Size:
6.42 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format