Benefits, Costs, and Distributional Impacts of a Groundwater Trading Program in the Diamond Valley, Nevada

dc.contributor.author

Zeff, Harrison

dc.contributor.author

Characklis, Greg

dc.contributor.author

Jeuland, Marc

dc.contributor.author

Kaczan, David

dc.contributor.author

Murray, Brian

dc.contributor.author

Locklier, Katie

dc.date.accessioned

2023-04-26T15:30:52Z

dc.date.available

2023-04-26T15:30:52Z

dc.date.issued

2016-10-17

dc.date.updated

2023-04-26T15:30:50Z

dc.description.abstract

In Nevada’s Diamond Valley, unsustainable groundwater pumping has decreased the aquifer’s water level, raising irrigators’ pumping costs and threatening the viability of existing wells and springs. Continued extraction in excess of natural recharge will trigger a legally required curtailment of water rights in the valley, which was recently declared a critical management area (CMA). The extent of rights curtailment is not mandated, but it could be as high as 64%, the amount required to reach the estimated natural recharge rate. The default policy for curtailment of water rights will occur according to the principle of prior appropriation, whereby rights are revoked in reverse order of their date of issuance. Rights granted most recently will be canceled first, and the revocation will proceed in order of increasing seniority until the government’s desired level of total water extraction is reached. Nevada law requires this intervention to occur within 10 years of the CMA declaration. By law, irrigators and other stakeholders can propose alternative policies for reducing groundwater over-extraction. Because sudden rights curtailment could have detrimental economic impacts, such policies are under discussion. This report analyzes the economic outcomes of sudden and alternative curtailment policies. Using a hydro-economic model tailored to conditions in the region to examine alternative extraction scenarios, the analysis finds that, with no action, the depth to the water table will exceed 200 feet by 2045; with policy action, aquifer levels can be stabilized at 170–180 feet and at higher depths with more gradual curtailment. Across all policy scenarios, net agricultural profit is lowest under the default curtailment policy, and it increases with more gradual curtailment. Under curtailment, allowing parties to trade rights to extract water modestly increases economic benefits relative to no-trade alternatives.

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/27127

dc.publisher

Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions

dc.subject

unsustainable groundwater pumping

dc.subject

critical management area

dc.subject

prior appropriation

dc.subject

irrigators

dc.subject

rights curtailment

dc.subject

economic outcomes

dc.subject

no-trade alternatives

dc.title

Benefits, Costs, and Distributional Impacts of a Groundwater Trading Program in the Diamond Valley, Nevada

dc.type

Report

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Nicholas School of the Environment

pubs.organisational-group

Sanford School of Public Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Sanford

pubs.organisational-group

Environmental Sciences and Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Nicholas Institute-Energy Initiative

pubs.publication-status

Published

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ni_r_16-02.pdf
Size:
3.94 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version