"Scarcity," "Futility," and "Moral Distress": A Case Analysis of the Challenges of Sound Ethical Description.
Date
2025-11
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Citation Stats
Attention Stats
Abstract
Appropriate use of ethical terminology is critical to effective, goal-concordant care, particularly for patients who are critically ill or nearing the end of life. In this case analysis, we describe how the ethical terms "scarcity," "futility," and "moral distress" were used in ways that failed to accurately capture the clinical situation, and likely favored the viewpoints of the clinical team. While careful attention to accurate clinical and ethical terminology is challenging in cases like this, we argue it is essential to communicate honestly and effectively with patients and families grappling with difficult decisions in these contexts.
Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Subjects
Citation
Permalink
Published Version (Please cite this version)
Publication Info
Frush, Benjamin W, and Sean Gaffney (2025). "Scarcity," "Futility," and "Moral Distress": A Case Analysis of the Challenges of Sound Ethical Description. Journal of pain and symptom management, 70(5). pp. e332–e336. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.07.025 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/34824.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
Scholars@Duke
Benjamin Wade Frush
Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.
