COVID-19 vaccination telephone outreach: an analysis of the medical student experience.

Loading...

Date

2023-12

Authors

Wu, James F
Abenoza, Nathalie
Bosco, Julia M
Minshew, Lana M
Beckius, Anna
Kastner, Mandy
Hilgeman, Brian
Muntz, Martin D

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

6
views
14
downloads

Citation Stats

Abstract

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic diminished opportunities for medical students to gain clinical confidence and the ability to contribute to patient care. Our study sought out to understand the value of telephone outreach to schedule COVID-19 vaccines on medical student education.

Materials and methods

Forty students engaged in telephone outreach targeting patients aged 65+ without active patient portals to schedule COVID-19 vaccines. Data consisted of a single administration retrospective pre/post survey inquiring about what students learned, expectations, other health-care processes that would benefit from outreach, and interest in a population health elective. Likert items were analyzed and open response analysis involved inductive coding and generation of thematic summaries by condensing codes into broader themes. Demographic data of patients called and subsequently received the vaccine were also collected.

Results

There were 33 survery respondents. There was a statistically significant increase in net comfortability for pre-clerkship students for documenting in Epic, providing telehealth care, counseling on common health-care myths, having challenging conversations, cold-calling patients, and developing an initial trusting relationship with patients. The majority called and who received the vaccine were non-Hispanic Black, within the high SVI category, and had Medicare and/or Medicaid. Qualitative data showed that students emphasized communication, the role of trusted messengers, the need to be open minded, and meeting patients where they are.

Discussion

Engaging students in telephone outreach early in the COVID-19 pandemic provided students the opportunity to develop their skills as physicians-in-training, contribute to combating the ongoing pandemic, and add value to the primary care team. This experience allowed students to practice patience, empathy, and vulnerability to understand why patients had not received the COVID-19 vaccine; this was an invaluable experience that helped students develop the skills to become empathetic and caring physicians, and supports the continued role of telehealth in future medical school curriculum.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Humans, Vaccination, Retrospective Studies, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Students, Medical, Telephone, Aged, Medicare, United States, Pandemics, COVID-19, COVID-19 Vaccines

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1080/10872981.2023.2207249

Publication Info

Wu, James F, Nathalie Abenoza, Julia M Bosco, Lana M Minshew, Anna Beckius, Mandy Kastner, Brian Hilgeman, Martin D Muntz, et al. (2023). COVID-19 vaccination telephone outreach: an analysis of the medical student experience. Medical education online, 28(1). p. 2207249. 10.1080/10872981.2023.2207249 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/33423.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Minshew

Lana M Minshew

Instructor in the Department of Anesthesiology

Dr. Minshew is an educational researcher, qualitative methodologist, and learning scientist who brings a unique interdisciplinary perspective to health professions education. Her professional foundation includes seven years as a K-12 science teacher, a Master's in Educational Psychology from the University of Houston, and a doctorate in the Learning Sciences from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.  Dr. Minshew’s doctoral research focused on collaborative learning and scientific argumentation development with an emphasis on qualitative methods and design-based research. This foundation was enhanced through a postdoctoral research fellowship in the Center for Innovative Pharmacy Education and Research (CIPhER) at the UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy. Prior to joining Duke, Dr. Minshew was an Assistant Professor in the Clinical Sciences Department (School of Pharmacy) and the Division of General Internal Medicine (School of Medicine) at the Medical College of Wisconsin.

Dr. Minshew's research agenda centers on three interconnected themes that collectively advance evidence-based health professions education: the application of educational theory to health professions contexts, design thinking methodologies for curricular innovation, and faculty development and professional flourishing. Her current research portfolio demonstrates this integrated approach through several major initiatives, including a longitudinal study examining physician virtue and professional flourishing that explores how training environments shape both competence and character, and parallel research with pharmacy faculty investigating educational and systemic factors contributing to faculty burnout and academic exodus. Through the Knowledge Informing Collaboration for Scholarship (KICS) research group, she leads systematic investigations of educational theory application in health professions education while coordinating best practices research in resident medical education. Her work represents a synthesis of educational theory, qualitative research expertise, and healthcare education practice that enables her to address persistent challenges in medical and pharmacy education while developing innovative solutions grounded in empirical evidence.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.