Is redo mitral mortality getting better or getting worse?

dc.contributor.author

Glower, Donald D

dc.date.accessioned

2021-08-02T20:52:04Z

dc.date.available

2021-08-02T20:52:04Z

dc.date.issued

2021-07-03

dc.date.updated

2021-08-02T20:52:03Z

dc.description.abstract

Zubarevich et al. present the 30 day and 1-year outcomes of redo mitral valve replacement in 58 high-risk patients. The authors conclude that careful patient selection and risk stratification provides acceptable surgical results in this cohort. This series reminds us that increased use of bioprostheses, increased use of mitral replacement instead of repair, and an aging population drive the volume of high-risk redo mitral replacement. It remains to be seen whether redo mitral mortality is getting better or worse, but the risk and the patients will be with us for some time.

dc.identifier.issn

0886-0440

dc.identifier.issn

1540-8191

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23565

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Wiley

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of cardiac surgery

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1111/jocs.15789

dc.subject

mitral valve

dc.subject

reoperation

dc.subject

valve surgery

dc.title

Is redo mitral mortality getting better or getting worse?

dc.type

Journal article

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Surgery, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.publication-status

Published

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Glower2021jocs.15789.pdf
Size:
163.7 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format