Comparing Self-Management Programs with and without Peer Support among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Clinical Trial.
Date
2022-10
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Repository Usage Stats
views
downloads
Citation Stats
Attention Stats
Abstract
Rationale: Self-management support (SMS) is an essential component of care for patients who have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but there is little evidence on how to provide SMS most effectively to these patients. Peer support (i.e., support provided by a person with a similar medical condition) has been successfully used to promote self-management among patients with various chronic conditions, yet no randomized studies have focused on testing its effects for patients with COPD. Objectives: To assess whether adding peer support to healthcare professional (HCP) support to help patients with COPD self-management results in better health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and less acute care use. Methods: A two-arm randomized controlled trial was performed at one academic and one community hospital and their affiliate clinics. The study population included patients aged ⩾40 years who had been diagnosed with COPD by a physician and were currently receiving daily treatment for it. Two self-management support strategies were compared over 6 months. One strategy relied on the HCP for COPD self-management (HCP support); the other used a dual approach involving both HCPs and peer supporters (HCP Plus Peer). The primary outcome was change in HRQoL measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire at 6 months (range, 0-100, lower is better; four-point meaningful difference). Secondary outcomes included COPD-related and all-cause hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Analysis was conducted under intention to treat. Results: The number of enrolled participants was 292. Mean age was 67.7 (standard deviation, 9.4) years; 70.9% of participants were White, and 61.3% were female. St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores were not significantly different between the study arms at 6 months. HCP Plus Peer arm participants had fewer COPD-related acute care events at 3 months (incidence rate ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.93) and 6 months (incidence rate ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99). Conclusions: Adding peer support to HCP support to help patients self-manage COPD did not further improve HRQoL in this study. However, it did result in fewer COPD-related acute care events during the 6-month intervention period. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02891200).
Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Citation
Permalink
Published Version (Please cite this version)
Publication Info
Aboumatar, Hanan, Emmanuel E Garcia Morales, Leah R Jager, Mohammad Naqibuddin, Samuel Kim, Jamia Saunders, Lee Bone, John Linnell, et al. (2022). Comparing Self-Management Programs with and without Peer Support among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Clinical Trial. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 19(10). pp. 1687–1696. 10.1513/annalsats.202108-932oc Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/31289.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
Scholars@Duke
Joseph Neiman
Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.