Characterization of cardiovascular clinical events and impact of event adjudication on the treatment effect of darapladib versus placebo in patients with stable coronary heart disease: Insights from the STABILITY trial.

dc.contributor.author

Held, Claes

dc.contributor.author

White, Harvey D

dc.contributor.author

Stewart, Ralph AH

dc.contributor.author

Davies, Richard

dc.contributor.author

Sampson, Shani

dc.contributor.author

Chiswell, Karen

dc.contributor.author

Silverstein, Adam

dc.contributor.author

Lopes, Renato D

dc.contributor.author

Heldestad, Ulrika

dc.contributor.author

Budaj, Andrzej

dc.contributor.author

Mahaffey, Kenneth W

dc.contributor.author

Wallentin, Lars

dc.contributor.author

STABILITY Investigators

dc.date.accessioned

2024-06-06T14:49:53Z

dc.date.available

2024-06-06T14:49:53Z

dc.date.issued

2019-02

dc.description.abstract

Background

Clinical Endpoint Classification (CEC) in clinical trials allows FOR standardized, systematic, blinded, and unbiased adjudication of investigator-reported events. We quantified the agreement rates in the STABILITY trial on 15,828 patients with stable coronary heart disease.

Methods

Investigators were instructed to report all potential events. Each reported event was reviewed independently by 2 reviewers according to prespecified processes and prespecified end point definitions. Concordance between reported and adjudicated cardiovascular (CV) events was evaluated, as well as event classification influence on final study results.

Results

In total, CEC reviewed 7,096 events: 1,064 deaths (696 CV deaths), 958 myocardial infarctions (MI), 433 strokes, 182 transient ischemic attacks, 2,052 coronary revascularizations, 1,407 hospitalizations for unstable angina, and 967 hospitalizations for heart failure. In total, 71.8% events were confirmed by CEC. Concordance was high (>80%) for cause of death and nonfatal MI and lower for hospitalization for unstable angina (25%) and heart failure (50%). For the primary outcome (composite of CV death, MI, and stroke), investigators reported 2,086 events with 82.5% confirmed by CEC. The STABILITY trial treatment effect of darapladib versus placebo on the primary outcome was consistent using investigator-reported events (hazard ratio 0.96 [95% CI 0.87-1.06]) or adjudicated events (hazard ratio 0.94 [95% CI 0.85-1.03]).

Conclusions

The primary outcome results of the STABILITY trial were consistent whether using investigator-reported or CEC-adjudicated events. The proportion of investigator-reported events confirmed by CEC varied by type of event. These results should help improve event identification in clinical trials to optimize ascertainment and adjudication.
dc.identifier

S0002-8703(18)30306-5

dc.identifier.issn

0002-8703

dc.identifier.issn

1097-6744

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/31121

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

American heart journal

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.ahj.2018.10.010

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

STABILITY Investigators

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Ischemic Attack, Transient

dc.subject

Coronary Disease

dc.subject

Angina, Unstable

dc.subject

Myocardial Infarction

dc.subject

Benzaldehydes

dc.subject

Oximes

dc.subject

Placebos

dc.subject

Hospitalization

dc.subject

Endpoint Determination

dc.subject

Heart Failure

dc.subject

Stroke

dc.subject

Kaplan-Meier Estimate

dc.subject

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

dc.subject

Phospholipase A2 Inhibitors

dc.title

Characterization of cardiovascular clinical events and impact of event adjudication on the treatment effect of darapladib versus placebo in patients with stable coronary heart disease: Insights from the STABILITY trial.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Chiswell, Karen|0000-0002-0279-9093

duke.contributor.orcid

Silverstein, Adam|0000-0003-2013-5087

duke.contributor.orcid

Lopes, Renato D|0000-0003-2999-4961

pubs.begin-page

65

pubs.end-page

73

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Staff

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Cardiology

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

208

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
201902_AmericanHeartJournal.pdf
Size:
491.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version