Is patient satisfaction static at 5 years after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data.
Date
2026-05
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Citation Stats
Attention Stats
Abstract
Surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) aims to improve neurological deterioration. However, long-term predictors of outcome are unknown. The present study examined highest and lowest patient-reported satisfaction at the 5-year follow-up. The authors hypothesized that the most satisfied patients experience durable long-term improvement and have distinct characteristics compared to the least satisfied patients. Prospectively collected data from the Spine CORe™ study group of the Quality Outcomes Database cervical spine module were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by North American Spine Society (NASS) satisfaction scores of 1 (most satisfied) and 4 (least satisfied). Demographics, surgical characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared between cohorts at baseline and 24 and 60 months of follow-up. A mixed-effects logistic regression assessed independent predictors of those who were most and least satisfied at 60 months. Univariate and multivariable analyses were repeated in the subsample of most satisfied patients at 2 years. Univariate analysis was completed for the subsample of least satisfied patients at 2 years. Of 1085 patients with CSM, 895 (82%) completed the 60-month follow-up. Of these 895 patients, 106 died within 5 years of surgery of unrelated causes, and 785 provided satisfaction scores at 60 months of follow-up. Of the 785 patients, 621 patients met inclusion criteria of reporting an NASS score of 1 or 4 at 60 months: 560 (90.2%) were most satisfied and 61 (9.8%) were least satisfied. The most satisfied cohort included more patients with bachelor's degrees (25% vs 13%, p = 0.043), more anterior cervical discectomies and fusions (61% vs 48%, p = 0.038), shorter hospitalizations (1.7 ± 1.8 vs 2.8 ± 2.6 days, p = 0.002), fewer laminectomies (23% vs 39%, p = 0.004), and fewer smokers (p = 0.036). Most satisfied patients reported higher baseline EuroQol visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) scores (60.8 ± 21.3 vs 51.5 ± 24.8, p = 0.008), but other baseline PROMs were similar. In multivariable analysis, college education (OR 2.54, p = 0.004), preoperative depression (OR 2.75, p = 0.043), higher baseline EQ-VAS score (OR 1.02, p = 0.009), and shorter hospitalization (OR 0.81, p = 0.003) independently predicted the most satisfaction at 60 months. Among 60-month least satisfied patients, 28% were most satisfied at 24 months. Among 60-month most satisfied patients, 2.9% were least satisfied at 24 months. Among 24-month most satisfied patients, maintenance of most satisfaction at 60 months was independently predicted by older age (OR 1.09, p = 0.045), preoperative pain (OR 9.28, p = 0.013), and higher 24-month neck pain numeric rating scale (NP-NRS) score (OR 1.58, p = 0.047). Neck Disability Index- and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA)-based independence measures correlated with a bidirectional satisfaction shift between 2 and 5 years. Highest NASS satisfaction scores at 5 years after surgery for CSM are predicted by college education of the patients, preoperative depression, higher baseline EQ-VAS scores, and shorter hospital length of stay. Younger age, lack of preoperative pain, and lower 2-year NP-NRS scores predict movement from most satisfied to least satisfied. After surgery for CSM, the majority of patients report the highest satisfaction NASS rating at 5 years, but delayed satisfaction reversals exist and warrant monitoring.
Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Subjects
Citation
Permalink
Published Version (Please cite this version)
Publication Info
Rezner, Aidan C, Kathleen M Hannon, Vincent J Alentado, Nicholas P Tippins, Andrew K Chan, Paul Park, Erica F Bisson, Regis W Haid, et al. (2026). Is patient satisfaction static at 5 years after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data. Neurosurgical focus, 60(5). p. E10. 10.3171/2025.12.focus25942 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/34632.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
Scholars@Duke
Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey
I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex spinal disorders. My patient evaluation and management philosophy is to provide engaged, compassionate care that focuses on providing the simplest and least aggressive treatment option for a particular condition. In many cases, non-operative treatment options exist to improve a patient’s symptoms. I have been actively engaged in clinical research to find the best ways to manage spinal disorders in order to achieve better results with fewer complications.
Oren N Gottfried
I specialize in the surgical management of all complex cervical, thoracic, lumbar, or sacral spinal diseases by using minimally invasive as well as standard approaches for arthritis or degenerative disease, deformity, tumors, and trauma. I have a special interest in the treatment of thoracolumbar deformities, occipital-cervical problems, and in helping patients with complex spinal issues from previously unsuccessful surgery or recurrent disease.I listen to my patients to understand their symptoms and experiences so I can provide them with the information and education they need to manage their disease. I make sure my patients understand their treatment options, and what will work best for their individual condition. I treat all my patients with care and concern – just as I would treat my family. I am available to address my patients' concerns before and after surgery. I aim to improve surgical outcomes for my patients and care of all spine patients with active research evaluating clinical and radiological results after spine surgery with multiple prospective databases. I am particularly interested in prevention of spinal deformity, infections, complications, and recurrent spinal disease. Also, I study whether patient specific variables including pelvic/sacral anatomy and sagittal spinal balance predict complications from spine surgery.
Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.
