Objective Test Scores Throughout Orthopedic Surgery Residency Suggest Disparities in Training Experience.

dc.contributor.author

Foster, Norah

dc.contributor.author

Price, Meghan

dc.contributor.author

Bettger, Janet Prvu

dc.contributor.author

Goodwin, C Rory

dc.contributor.author

Erickson, Melissa

dc.date.accessioned

2024-08-14T16:09:05Z

dc.date.available

2024-08-14T16:09:05Z

dc.date.issued

2021-09

dc.description.abstract

Diversifying clinical residencies, particularly in fields that are historically dominated by majority male (M/M) cohorts, is critical to improve both the training experiences of residents and the overall physician workforce. Orthopedic surgery in particular has low numbers of females and under-represented minorities (F/URM) at all levels of training and practice. Despite efforts to increase its diversity, this field has become more homogeneous in recent years. To highlight potential barriers and disparate training environments that may contribute to this dynamic, we present 25 years' worth of institutional data on standardized exam performance throughout residency. We report that despite starting residency with standardized exam scores that were comparable to their M/M peers, F/URM orthopedic surgery residents performed progressively worse on Orthopaedic In-service Training Exams throughout residency and had lower first pass rates on the American Board of Orthopedic Surgery Part 1. Given these findings, we propose that disparate performance on standardized test scores throughout residency could identify trainees that may have different experiences that negatively impact their exam performance. Shedding light on these underlying disparities provides opportunities to find meaningful and sustained ways to develop a culture of diversity and inclusion. It may also allow for other programs to identify similar patterns within their training programs. Overall, we propose monitoring test performance on standardized exams throughout orthopedic surgery residency to identify potential disparities in training experience; further, we acknowledge that interventions to mitigate these disparities require a broad, systems wide approach and a firm institutional commitment to reducing bias and working toward sustainable change.

dc.identifier

S1931-7204(21)00003-9

dc.identifier.issn

1931-7204

dc.identifier.issn

1878-7452

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/31375

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of surgical education

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.01.003

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Orthopedic Procedures

dc.subject

Orthopedics

dc.subject

Education, Medical, Graduate

dc.subject

Internship and Residency

dc.subject

Clinical Competence

dc.subject

United States

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Male

dc.title

Objective Test Scores Throughout Orthopedic Surgery Residency Suggest Disparities in Training Experience.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Bettger, Janet Prvu|0000-0001-9708-8413

duke.contributor.orcid

Goodwin, C Rory|0000-0002-6540-2751

pubs.begin-page

1400

pubs.end-page

1405

pubs.issue

5

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Radiation Oncology

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

University Initiatives & Academic Support Units

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Global Health Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.organisational-group

Duke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

78

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S1931720421000039.pdf
Size:
353.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format