Regional paths of development
| dc.contributor.author | Gereffi, Gary | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fonda, Stephanie | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-06T14:46:30Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1992-12-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Five broad theoretical perspectives frame much of the literature on regional paths of development: neoclassical economics, world-systems/dependency theories, the developmental state, institutional analysis, and Marxism. While these approaches are general in nature, there are marked affinities between individual theories and the experience of particular regions in the Third World. This review focuses on four Third-World regions: Latin America, East Asia, South Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa. East Asia comes out on top according to almost all indicators of economic and social development, followed by Latin America, South Asia, and, at a considerable distance from the rest, Africa. The comparative analysis of the paths of development followed in these regions not only generates useful insights about concrete development processes; it also serves as a tool for refining development theory itself, and points to promising new areas of research. -from Authors | |
| dc.identifier.uri | ||
| dc.publisher | Annual Reviews | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Annual review of sociology. Vol. 18 | |
| dc.title | Regional paths of development | |
| dc.type | Journal article | |
| pubs.begin-page | 419 | |
| pubs.end-page | 448 | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Duke | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Global Health Institute | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Institutes and Provost's Academic Units | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Sociology | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Trinity College of Arts & Sciences | |
| pubs.organisational-group | University Institutes and Centers | |
| pubs.publication-status | Published |
Files
Original bundle
- Name:
- 1992_Ann Review of Sociology_Gereffi & Fonda_Regional Paths of Development.pdf
- Size:
- 3.29 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format