Clearing up after the science wars: A response to emily A. Schultz

dc.contributor.author

Smith, BH

dc.date.accessioned

2020-02-01T15:41:34Z

dc.date.available

2020-02-01T15:41:34Z

dc.date.issued

2011-04-01

dc.date.updated

2020-02-01T15:41:33Z

dc.description.abstract

Emily Schultz seeks in "Fear of Scandalous Knowledge" (Schultz 2010) to bring important approaches in science studies, along with recent developments in related fields, to the attention of fellow anthropologists. She also seeks to counter lingering misunderstandings and misrepresentations of the views involved. Her conscientious efforts to both these ends should, I think, be applauded and I am glad that she found my book Scandalous Knowledge (Smith 2006) useful along the way. There are, however, a number of places where Schultz's phrasing or emphasis may itself be misleading. I note some of these below and offer a few additional comments. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

dc.identifier.issn

0093-8157

dc.identifier.issn

1556-3014

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/19906

dc.language

en

dc.publisher

Informa UK Limited

dc.relation.ispartof

Reviews in Anthropology

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1080/00938157.2011.572475

dc.title

Clearing up after the science wars: A response to emily A. Schultz

dc.type

Journal article

pubs.begin-page

165

pubs.end-page

168

pubs.issue

2

pubs.organisational-group

Trinity College of Arts & Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Literature

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

40

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
BHS-Schultz Response-revised.docx
Size:
108.43 KB
Format:
Unknown data format
Description:
Accepted version