Machine learning in the diagnosis, management, and care of patients with low back pain: a scoping review of the literature and future directions.

dc.contributor.author

Seas, Andreas

dc.contributor.author

Zachem, Tanner J

dc.contributor.author

Valan, Bruno

dc.contributor.author

Goertz, Christine

dc.contributor.author

Nischal, Shiva

dc.contributor.author

Chen, Sully F

dc.contributor.author

Sykes, David

dc.contributor.author

Tabarestani, Troy Q

dc.contributor.author

Wissel, Benjamin D

dc.contributor.author

Blackwood, Elizabeth R

dc.contributor.author

Holland, Christopher

dc.contributor.author

Gottfried, Oren

dc.contributor.author

Shaffrey, Christopher I

dc.contributor.author

Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M

dc.date.accessioned

2024-10-30T13:59:27Z

dc.date.available

2024-10-30T13:59:27Z

dc.date.issued

2024-09

dc.description.abstract

Background context

Low back pain (LBP) remains the leading cause of disability globally. In recent years, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a potentially useful tool to aid the diagnosis, management, and prognostication of LBP.

Purpose

In this review, we assess the scope of ML applications in the LBP literature and outline gaps and opportunities.

Study design/setting

A scoping review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.

Methods

Articles were extracted from the Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and IEEE Xplore databases. Title/abstract and full-text screening was performed by two reviewers. Data on model type, model inputs, predicted outcomes, and ML methods were collected.

Results

In total, 223 unique studies published between 1988 and 2023 were identified, with just over 50% focused on low-back-pain detection. Neural networks were used in 106 of these articles. Common inputs included patient history, demographics, and lab values (67% total). Articles published after 2010 were also likely to incorporate imaging data into their models (41.7% of articles). Of the 212 supervised learning articles identified, 168 (79.4%) mentioned use of a training or testing dataset, 116 (54.7%) utilized cross-validation, and 46 (21.7%) implemented hyperparameter optimization. Of all articles, only 8 included external validation and 9 had publicly available code.

Conclusions

Despite the rapid application of ML in LBP research, a majority of articles do not follow standard ML best practices. Furthermore, over 95% of articles cannot be reproduced or authenticated due to lack of code availability. Increased collaboration and code sharing are needed to support future growth and implementation of ML in the care of patients with LBP.
dc.identifier

S1529-9430(24)01029-5

dc.identifier.issn

1529-9430

dc.identifier.issn

1878-1632

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/31599

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.010

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

Artificial intelligence

dc.subject

Data science

dc.subject

Integrative medicine

dc.subject

Low back pain

dc.subject

Machine learning

dc.subject

Neural networks

dc.title

Machine learning in the diagnosis, management, and care of patients with low back pain: a scoping review of the literature and future directions.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Seas, Andreas|0000-0003-0624-1254

duke.contributor.orcid

Zachem, Tanner J|0000-0002-3129-1133

duke.contributor.orcid

Goertz, Christine|0000-0002-4700-3669

duke.contributor.orcid

Blackwood, Elizabeth R|0000-0002-4863-8674

duke.contributor.orcid

Shaffrey, Christopher I|0000-0001-9760-8386

duke.contributor.orcid

Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M|0000-0001-7151-2861

pubs.begin-page

S1529-9430(24)01029-5

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Pratt School of Engineering

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Student

pubs.organisational-group

Staff

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Thomas Lord Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

University Initiatives & Academic Support Units

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Medical Center Library & Archives

pubs.organisational-group

Duke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy

pubs.publication-status

Published

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Machine learning in the diagnosis, management, and care of patients with low back pain_ a scoping review of the literature and future directions.pdf
Size:
3.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format