Utilization of Quantitative EEG Trends for Critical Care Continuous EEG Monitoring: A Survey of Neurophysiologists.

dc.contributor.author

Swisher, Christa B

dc.contributor.author

Sinha, Saurabh R

dc.coverage.spatial

United States

dc.date.accessioned

2017-03-01T15:05:42Z

dc.date.available

2017-03-01T15:05:42Z

dc.date.issued

2016-12

dc.description.abstract

PURPOSE: Quantitative EEG (QEEG) can be used to assist with review of large amounts of data generated by critical care continuous EEG monitoring. This study aimed to identify current practices regarding the use of QEEG in critical care continuous EEG monitoring of critical care patients. METHODS: An online survey was sent to 796 members of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS), instructing only neurophysiologists to participate. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 75 neurophysiologists that use QEEG in their practice. Survey respondents reported that neurophysiologists and neurophysiology fellows are most likely to serve as QEEG readers (97% and 52%, respectively). However, 21% of respondents reported nonneurophysiologists are also involved with QEEG interpretation. The majority of nonneurophysiologist QEEG data review is aimed to alert neurophysiologists to periods of concern, but 22% reported that nonneurophysiologists use QEEG to directly guide clinical care. Quantitative EEG was used most frequently for seizure detection (92%) and burst suppression monitoring (59%). A smaller number of respondents use QEEG for monitoring the depth of sedation (29%), ischemia detection (28%), vasospasm detection (28%) and prognosis after cardiac arrest (21%). About half of the respondents do not review every page of the raw critical care continuous EEG record when using QEEG. Respondents prefer a panel of QEEG trends displayed as hemispheric data, when applicable. There is substantial variability regarding QEEG trend preferences for seizure detection and ischemia detection. CONCLUSIONS: QEEG is being used by neurophysiologists and nonneurophysiologists for applications beyond seizure detection, but practice patterns vary widely. There is a need for standardization of QEEG methods and practices.

dc.identifier

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27922904

dc.identifier

00004691-201612000-00009

dc.identifier.eissn

1537-1603

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13723

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

dc.relation.ispartof

J Clin Neurophysiol

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1097/WNP.0000000000000287

dc.title

Utilization of Quantitative EEG Trends for Critical Care Continuous EEG Monitoring: A Survey of Neurophysiologists.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Sinha, Saurabh R|0000-0003-0305-6731

pubs.author-url

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27922904

pubs.begin-page

538

pubs.end-page

544

pubs.issue

6

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Neurology

pubs.organisational-group

Neurology, Epilepsy and Sleep

pubs.organisational-group

Neurology, Neurocritical Care

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

33

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Utilization_of_Quantitative_EEG_Trends_for.9.pdf
Size:
388.87 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version