Neurologic Adverse Events Following Three-Column Osteotomy for Adult Spine Deformities: A Prospective Multicenter Study.
Date
2026-04
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Citation Stats
Attention Stats
Abstract
Study design
Prospective, multicenter study.Objective
To compare and characterize complications in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with and without 3-column osteotomy (3CO).Summary of background data
Although 3CO is associated with increased risk of neurologic adverse events, no study has, to our knowledge, compared and characterized sensory and motor neurologic complications in ASD patients with vs. without 3CO.Materials and methods
Demographics, surgical characteristics, and neurologic complications were collected for 553 ASD patients. Lower extremity motor scores (LEMSs) were compared at baseline and postoperatively. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with neurologic adverse events.Results
Among 553 ASD patients, 130 (23.5%) underwent 3CO. More patients with 3CO were revision patients (67.7% vs. 35.0%; P<0.001), presented with sagittal deformity (43.9% vs. 31.0%; P=0.008), and had longer operative times (455.6 vs. 407.3 min; P=0.001) and greater estimated blood loss (EBL) (1,650 vs. 1,000 mL; P<0.001) than patients without 3CO. The incidence of neurologic adverse events was greater among patients with vs. without 3CO (23.1% vs. 15.4%; P=0.04). Multivariate analysis revealed that older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.288 per 10-year increase, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.060-1.565, P=0.01) and longer operative time (OR 1.088, 95% CI 1.001-1.004, P=0.01) were significant predictors of neurologic adverse events. No between-group difference in LEMS was observed at 6-week (49.0 vs. 49.0; P=0.90) or 1-year (49.4 vs. 49.3; P=0.71) follow-up. By 1-year follow-up, 20.5% of 3CO patients and 21.6% of patients without 3CO had residual motor deficit.Conclusions
Compared with patients who did not undergo 3CO, more patients with 3CO had prior instrumentation, presented with sagittal deformity, had longer operative time and greater EBL, and were more likely to have a neurologic adverse event. At 1-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in LEMS between the two groups.Level of evidence
III.Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Subjects
Citation
Permalink
Published Version (Please cite this version)
Publication Info
Kim, Andrew H, Ahmed Sulieman, Wesley M Durand, Micheal Raad, Lawrence Lenke, Jeffrey L Gum, Richard A Hostin, Breton G Line, et al. (2026). Neurologic Adverse Events Following Three-Column Osteotomy for Adult Spine Deformities: A Prospective Multicenter Study. Spine. 10.1097/brs.0000000000005690 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/34838.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
Scholars@Duke
Peter Passias
Throughout my medical career, I have remained dedicated to improving my patients' quality of life. As a specialist in adult cervical and spinal deformity surgery, I understand the significant impact our interventions have on individuals suffering from debilitating pain and physical and mental health challenges. Spinal deformity surgery merges the complexities of spinal biomechanics with the needs of an aging population. My research focuses on spinal alignment, biomechanics, innovative surgical techniques, and health economics to ensure value-based care that enhances patient outcomes.
Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey
I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex spinal disorders. My patient evaluation and management philosophy is to provide engaged, compassionate care that focuses on providing the simplest and least aggressive treatment option for a particular condition. In many cases, non-operative treatment options exist to improve a patient’s symptoms. I have been actively engaged in clinical research to find the best ways to manage spinal disorders in order to achieve better results with fewer complications.
Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.