Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Women's Toileting Behavior Scale.
Date
2019-06
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Repository Usage Stats
views
downloads
Citation Stats
Abstract
PURPOSE:The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Toileting Behavior Scale (KTBS) to assess women's toileting behavior related to urinary elimination. METHODS:The original English version, the Toileting Behavior: Women's Elimination Behaviors scale, was translated into Korean with forward and backward translation. Examinations of internal consistency reliability, construct validity using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, item convergent validity, and discriminant validity were conducted with SPSS/WIN 23.0 and AMOS/WIN 23.0 software. Concurrent validity was examined with the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form. RESULTS:Cronbach α for the overall scale was 0.78, and the 5 subscales ranged from 0.79 to 0.94. The exploratory factor analysis revealed 5 factors for the 17-item scale. Confirmatory factor analysis supported good convergent and discriminant values (λ=0.49-0.96, critical ratio=4.51-15.68>1.97, P<0.05, construct reliability=0.72-0.97). The concurrent validity was supported by correlation with the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (r=0.146, P=0.011). CONCLUSION:The KTBS (17 items) is an appropriate tool to measure older Korean women's toileting behavior with good validity and reliability.
Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Citation
Permalink
Published Version (Please cite this version)
Publication Info
So, Aeyoung, Jennie C De Gagne and Sunah Park (2019). Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Women's Toileting Behavior Scale. International neurourology journal, 23(2). pp. 151–160. 10.5213/inj.1938018.009 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/26988.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
Scholars@Duke
Jennie De Gagne
Jennie Chang De Gagne, PhD, DNP, RN, NPD-BC, CNE, ANEF, FAAN, is a Clinical Professor and Director of the Nursing Education Specialty at the Duke University School of Nursing (DUSON). A prominent scholar in cybercivility and a recent thought leader in cyberethics, especially in AI integration with nursing education, she advances teaching and learning through instructional technologies that promote meaningful, student-centered experiences. De Gagne has authored over 200 publications, including 125 in peer-reviewed journals, and delivered 150 presentations on topics such as technology integration, faculty development, and digital civility and ethics. Recognized with numerous scholarships and awards, she is a fellow of both the National League for Nursing Academy of Nursing Education (ANEF) and the American Academy of Nursing (FAAN). Her expertise has garnered national and international media attention, leading to interviews in both print and digital media, and she brings significant experience in workforce training through distance and online education.
Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.