Analysis of PET Image Quality Using 2D vs 3D ROIs in Small Spheres
Date
2026
Authors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Repository Usage Stats
views
downloads
Attention Stats
Abstract
Modern positron emission tomography (PET) systems have substantially improved insensitivity, timing performance, and reconstruction methods; however, the conventional NEMA image-quality phantom remains limited in evaluating sub-centimeter lesion de- tectability. This work investigated the image quality of small-sphere PET using an exper- imental image-quality phantom designed to extend conventional NEMA-style assessment into the sub-centimeter regime, along with an automated analysis workflow for reproducible metric extraction. A second whole-body phantom containing multiple small spheres was also evaluated in a more anthropomorphic geometry. An automated MATLAB-based pipeline was developed to process PET DICOM data, localize sphere centers, define regions of interest, and compute contrast recovery coefficient (CRC), coefficient of variation (CoV), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The experimen- tal phantom was evaluated across multiple PET/CT systems and reconstruction settings. Results showed that averaged-frame localization closely matched static acquisition, with a mean whole-phantom percent error of less than 1%. CRC and CNR increased with sphere diameter, and the greatest reconstruction-dependent differences were observed for the small- est spheres. In the whole-body phantom, the expected tradeoff between contrast recovery and background variability was observed. Overall, this work demonstrates the value of smaller-sphere phantom designs for more sensitive evaluation of modern PET image quality.
Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Subjects
Citation
Permalink
Citation
Simmons, Justin (2026). Analysis of PET Image Quality Using 2D vs 3D ROIs in Small Spheres. Master's thesis, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/35086.
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, student scholarship that was shared on DukeSpace after 2009 is made available to the public under a Creative Commons Attribution / Non-commercial / No derivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND) license. All rights in student work shared on DukeSpace before 2009 remain with the author and/or their designee, whose permission may be required for reuse.
