Gene Therapy and Spinal Fusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Available Data.

dc.contributor.author

Cottrill, Ethan

dc.contributor.author

Pennington, Zach

dc.contributor.author

Sattah, Nathan

dc.contributor.author

Jing, Crystal

dc.contributor.author

Salven, Dave

dc.contributor.author

Johnson, Eli

dc.contributor.author

Downey, Max

dc.contributor.author

Varghese, Shyni

dc.contributor.author

Rocos, Brett

dc.contributor.author

Richardson, William

dc.date.accessioned

2024-08-14T16:51:40Z

dc.date.available

2024-08-14T16:51:40Z

dc.date.issued

2024-06

dc.description.abstract

Objective

To analyze the extant literature describing the application of gene therapy to spinal fusion.

Methods

A systematic review of the English-language literature was performed. The search query was designed to include all published studies examining gene therapy approaches to promote spinal fusion. Approaches were classified as ex vivo (delivery of genetically modified cells) or in vivo (delivery of growth factors via vectors). The primary endpoint was fusion rate. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate the overall odds ratio (OR) of fusion using a gene therapy approach and overall fusion rate. Subgroup analyses of fusion rate were also performed for each gene therapy approach.

Results

Of 1179 results, 35 articles met criteria for inclusion (all preclinical), of which 26 utilized ex vivo approaches and 9 utilized in vivo approaches. Twenty-seven articles (431 animals) were included in the meta-analysis. Gene therapy use was associated with significantly higher fusion rates (OR 77; 95% confidence interval {CI}: [31, 192]; P < 0.001); ex vivo strategies had a greater effect (OR 136) relative to in vivo strategies (OR 18) (P = 0.017). The overall fusion rate using a gene therapy approach was 80% (95% CI: [62%, 93%]; P < 0.001); overall fusion rates were significantly higher in subjects treated with ex vivo compared to in vivo strategies (90% vs. 42%; P = 0.011). For both ex vivo and in vivo approaches, the effect of gene therapy on fusion was independent of animal model.

Conclusions

Gene therapy may augment spinal fusion; however, future investigation in clinical populations is necessary.
dc.identifier

S1878-8750(24)00560-6

dc.identifier.issn

1878-8750

dc.identifier.issn

1878-8769

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/31384

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

World neurosurgery

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.wneu.2024.03.174

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

Animals

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Spinal Fusion

dc.subject

Genetic Therapy

dc.title

Gene Therapy and Spinal Fusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Available Data.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Varghese, Shyni|0000-0002-0004-7947

duke.contributor.orcid

Rocos, Brett|0000-0002-0808-5585

duke.contributor.orcid

Richardson, William|0000-0001-9608-199X|0000-0002-8750-7263|0009-0003-7526-7797

pubs.begin-page

219

pubs.end-page

234.e4

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Pratt School of Engineering

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Staff

pubs.organisational-group

Pratt

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Biomedical Engineering

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Global Health Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Regeneration Center

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

186

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S1878875024005606-main.pdf
Size:
4.98 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format